The Delhi High Court has remarked that a person cannot be deprived of the right to livelihood and dignity solely due to old age and poor health, as it upheld an order mandating the eviction of a tenant from a property needed by the landlord for business purposes.
The court dismissed the tenant’s argument regarding the landlord’s age and health, asserting that doubts cannot overshadow the bona fides of the landlord’s requirement.
Justice Girish Kathpalia emphasized that old age and frail health do not automatically negate the need for premises to conduct business or earn a livelihood.
Highlighting that there was no evidence suggesting the landlord was bedridden or financially dependent on his son’s business, the court reaffirmed that age and health should not impede one’s right to livelihood and dignity.
The landlord, claiming ownership of a shop in Paharganj, sought eviction of the tenant, citing the necessity to use the premises for business purposes due to the lack of suitable alternative accommodation.
The court noted the surrender of a plot in Bawana due to distance and age-related constraints, but clarified that this did not imply an inability to conduct business from the subject premises.
The Delhi High Court on Monday has extended the interim bail of Kuldeep Singh Sengar,…
The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…
The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…
Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…
The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…
The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…