Delhi High Court

Plea in Delhi HC against Chirag Paswan’s Election as Lok Sabha MP

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday stated that a challenge to the election of Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) president Chirag Paswan from the Hajipur Lok Sabha seat in Bihar should be addressed in the Patna High Court.

The court scheduled a hearing for the election petition on August 28, 2024.

“How is this maintainable in this high court? The constituency is in the state of Bihar. It is better you withdraw (the plea) and go to the jurisdictional high court,” Justice Vikas Mahajan remarked to the petitioner’s counsel. “This court will not have the jurisdiction,” the judge orally noted during the hearing.

In her plea, the petitioner has alleged that she was a victim of sexual assault at the “insistence” of Prince Raj and his associates, including Chirag Paswan, his cousin. She claimed that Paswan did not disclose this “criminal antecedent” when filing his nomination for the Lok Sabha elections.

The plea also noted that an FIR was registered in 2021 related to the alleged sexual assault and argued that filing a false affidavit or concealing information about criminal cases in the affidavit violates Section 125A of the Representation of the People Act, which is punishable with six months imprisonment. Advocate Sidhant Kumar, representing the Election Commission (EC), argued that the election petition was not maintainable in Delhi under the Representation of the People Act, as the election occurred in Bihar.

Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, appearing for the Centre, further contended that, according to the law, only a voter from the constituency or a candidate can file an election petition to challenge an election, and the petitioner did not fall into either category.

“The Act is clear. Her locus is in question. You have to be a voter in the constituency or a candidate…. Merit will come later; first, the petitioner has to overcome this hurdle,” he argued.

The petitioner’s counsel requested time from the court to address the issue of the court’s jurisdiction on the next date of hearing.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

‘Rippling’ Co-Founder Moves Madras HC Alleging Police Harassment Amid Escalating Feud With Wife

Prasanna Sankar, the co-founder of Rippling, has approached the Madras High Court with allegations that…

13 hours ago

Hyderabad Court Sentences Life Imprisonment To Priest Who Killed Lover, Sealed Body In Septic Tank

A Hyderabad court has sentenced Venkata Sai Surya Krishna, a priest, to life imprisonment for…

14 hours ago

Sambhal Violence: UP Court Rejects Interim Bail To Shahi Jama Masjid President

A local court on Thursday rejected the interim bail plea of Zafar Ali, the president…

15 hours ago

DHC To Review AAP’s Somnath Bharti’s Petition Against BJP’s Satish Upadhyay’s Election Win

Aam Aadmi Party leader Somnath Bharti on Thursday has filed a petition in the Delhi…

16 hours ago

SC To Decide Maintainability Of Writ Petition Filed To Reconsider Death Penalty Based On 2022 ‘Manoj’ Verdict

The Supreme Court of India on Thursday to decide whether it can entertain a petition…

17 hours ago

Anti-CAA Case: Activist Sharjeel Imam Challenges Saket Court’s Order; HC Issues Notice

Activist Sharjeel Imam has approached the Delhi High Court on Thursday to challenge a recent…

17 hours ago