Categories: Delhi High Court

“School Cannot Exist Without Playground; Students Have Right To Healthy Environment”: SC

The Supreme Court recently emphasised the importance of playgrounds in schools and a safe environment for students.


This was noted by a bench of Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna when they called for the removal of encroachments on land designated for a school playground.


The Court determined that due to such encroachment, a nearby school had no playground at all.
The bench remarked, “A school cannot exist without a playground. Even students who attend such a school have a right to a healthy environment.”


The Court added that any unauthorised possession of land designated for playgrounds cannot be directed to be legalized.


The bench then ordered the persons found to have illegally occupied the said plot of land to vacate the area within twelve months or face having their unauthorised structures removed.


The ruling followed the Haryana government’s appeal of a 2016 order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that had cleared the way for the regularisation of the encroachments near the school.


Before the High Court, the respondents (private individuals) offered to give the gram panchayat double the amount of land instead of having to give up possession of the encroached land. Other people had offered to pay the land’s market value. A local commissioner had previously filed a report establishing that the respondents and other occupants were in unlawful possession of the land.


The High Court dismissed the case after ordering that the concerned authorities separate vacant areas from residential plots on the encroached land whenever possible, and use the vacant plots for the school’s use.


To legalise the unauthorised occupation, the authorities were also given the option of accepting the respondents’ offer of alternative land or the market value for the encroached land.


The Supreme Court, on the other hand, ruled that the High Court’s orders could not be carried out. The Supreme Court then concluded that the High Court had made a grave error in ordering the authorities to legalise the unauthorised occupation of the gram panchayat’s land.


The bench noted that there was no other panchayati land available for use as a school playground. In this regard, the Court noted that other private parties who owned land adjacent to the school refused to part with their plots.


As a result, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court order as “unsustainable” and ordered the removal of encroachments.


“The original writ petitioners are granted 12 months to vacate the land, which they are occupying unauthorizedly, and if they do not vacate the lands in question within one year from today, the appropriate authority is directed to remove their unauthorised and illegal occupation and possession,” the Court stated.

Isha Das

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago