Delhi High Court

“Third Degree Methods Use”- Delhi Excise Policy Accused Pillai, Court Seeks ED Reply

The Delhi High Court has sought the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) response on a petition by Hyderabad businessman Arun Ramchandra Pillai, who is challenging his arrest and detention in a money laundering case related to the alleged Delhi excise policy scam.

In his petition, Pillai claims that “third degree” methods were applied to extract information during his custody, with “third degree” referring to brutality during police interrogations.

A single bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma directed the ED to file a response concerning the plea’s maintainability.

Advocate Nitesh Rana, representing the petitioner, argued that the arrest order of March 6 by the Enforcement Directorate and subsequent remand orders were in violation of the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). He contended that no grounds for arrest were provided, either orally or in writing, as required by Section 19(1) of the PMLA, and that this violated his constitutional rights.

The petitioner further stated that the remand orders did not record any satisfaction regarding whether the ED had material on record to form “reasons to believe” that he was guilty of an offense under the PMLA. The petition alleged that the ED had employed coercive tactics and “third-degree measures” in a vindictive manner to obtain information, and these actions were enabled by the arrest order and remand orders.

The ED’s counsel argued that the petition was not maintainable. The court has scheduled the matter for further hearing on November 3, when the petitioner’s bail plea will also be considered.

Earlier this month, Pillai had sought bail in the case, contending that there was no evidence to justify his continued detention. A trial court had previously denied his bail plea, stating that his role was more serious than that of some other accused who remained in custody, and that the ED’s case appeared genuine.

The ED has alleged in its charge sheet that Pillai was a close associate of BRS MLC K Kavitha. The money laundering case by the ED originates from a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) FIR.

The case involves irregularities in the modification of the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22 and allegations of undue favors extended to license holders. The Delhi government implemented the excise policy on November 17, 2021, but scrapped it at the end of September 2022 due to corruption allegations.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago