Delhi High Court

Wrestlers Sexual Harassment Case: Delhi HC Grants Brij Bhushan Time to Submit Contentions

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court on Thursday granted former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and ex-BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh additional time to submit his contentions for seeking the quashing of the FIR and charges framed against him in a sexual harassment case filed by several women wrestlers.

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna granted Singh two weeks and scheduled the matter for further hearing on September 26, 2024.

The court noted, “Petitioner seeks time to prepare a short note raising all the contentions for seeking the quashing of the charge sheet and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. Two weeks are granted to do so.” This request was opposed by the counsel for the State and the victims, who argued that it was not maintainable.

The complaints were filed by six women wrestlers. The trial court determined that the complaint of one was time-barred and therefore framed charges based on the complaints of five victims. Senior advocate Rebecca John pointed out that this indicates a thorough consideration by the trial court.

During the hearing, the court questioned Singh for filing a single petition to challenge both the order framing charges and the FIR, charge sheet, and all other proceedings. “There can’t be an omnibus order for everything,” the court said, noting that Singh was challenging all aspects after the trial had commenced. “This is nothing but an oblique way,” the court added.

Advocate Rajiv Mohan, representing Singh, argued that there was no commonality between the causes and no continuity in the instances stated by the alleged victims. He claimed the allegations against Singh were “motivated” and that the complaints were part of a common agenda to remove him from his position as WFI chief.

The high court remarked that all the arguments now presented by Singh should have been considered by the trial court at the time of framing charges. Singh contended in his plea that the investigation was biased, as only the victims’ versions—who were allegedly seeking revenge—were considered, and the charge sheet was filed without addressing the alleged falsehood of the claims.

Singh maintains that he has been falsely implicated and that no offence, as alleged by the prosecution, was committed. On May 21, the trial court had framed charges of sexual harassment, intimidation, and outraging the modesty of women against Singh. Co-accused and former WFI assistant secretary Vinod Tomar also faced a charge of criminal intimidation.

The Delhi Police filed an FIR against Singh following the Supreme Court’s intervention in May 2023.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

“Wife’s Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty”: Madras HC Turns Down Husband’s Divorce Plea

The Madras High Court rejected man's request for divorce, dismissing his claims that his wife’s…

16 hours ago

Delhi Riots Case: Delhi HC Lists Tasleem Ahmed’s Bail Plea Before Roster Bench

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the bail plea of Tasleem Ahmed for hearing before…

16 hours ago

Omar Abdullah Announces New Assembly, Salary Hike, Final Amnesty & Heritage Push For J&K

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made several significant announcements on Thursday during the…

16 hours ago

UP Court Issues Notice To Rahul Gandhi After Complaint Alleges His Words ‘Hurt Sentiments’

A local court in Sambhal has issued a notice to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, requiring…

17 hours ago

“Grabbing Minor’s Breasts, Breaking Pyjama Strings Doesn’t Qualify As Attempt To Rape”: Allahabad HC

A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court has sparked a critical examination of India's…

17 hours ago

IPL 2025: Saliva Ban Lifted After BCCI Gets Captains’ Nod

The restriction on using saliva to shine the ball will be removed in the 2025…

19 hours ago