The Karnataka High Court has clarified that an acquitted accused cannot have their passport withheld based on the pending appeal period against the acquittal order.
A single-judge Justice M Nagaprasanna granted relief to Francis Xavier Crasto by allowing his petition and directing the concerned court to release his passport.
Crasto’s passport had been seized following an FIR related to a crime in which he was involved. However, the Sessions Court acquitted him on April 12, 2023, without issuing any order under Section 452 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) regarding the seized passport. Subsequently, Crasto filed an application under Section 452 of CrPC seeking the return of his passport.
The trial court rejected the application, citing the pending appeal period against the acquittal order as the reason. The High Court found this reasoning to be erroneous, stating that a seized passport cannot be withheld after the petitioner’s acquittal solely because an appeal may be filed against the order.
Consequently, the High Court allowed the petition and directed the concerned court to release the passport to the petitioner.
The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…
The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…
Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…
The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…
The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…
The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…