States High court

Advocates Empowered to Act Against Harassment by Litigants Over Court Queries: Madras HC

The Madras High Court recently emphasized that advocates have the right to take appropriate legal action against litigants who harass them over queries posed by the court during a hearing.

The statement came after a lawyer representing a final year law student in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) informed the Court that he no longer wanted to represent the petitioner due to harassment he was facing from the petitioner.

The law student had filed a PIL seeking the State government’s direction to establish old age homes in every district of Tamil Nadu in accordance with the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act.

During the previous hearing on July 24, the petitioner’s counsel claimed that the State government had not established a single old age home. The Court recorded this statement and warned that it would impose a cost of ₹50,000 on the petitioner if the statement turned out to be incorrect.

The lawyer informed the Court that following the Court’s warning, the petitioner started harassing him, and thus, he sought permission to withdraw from the case.

The Court permitted the lawyer to do so and clarified that any query posed by the court during a hearing is just a query and not an order. The Court further asserted that any lawyer facing harassment from a litigant has the right to take necessary action against the litigant.

“The petitioner is also present here and seeks time to engage another lawyer. While we grant him time, this Court feels it necessary to reiterate that any queries posed by us are for the benefit of the litigants and queries do not indicate our order. Also, any advocate, who is harassed by a litigant following the court’s queries, or even otherwise, is entitled to take appropriate action against the litigant,” the bench stated.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

2013 Rape Case: SC Notices Gujarat Govt On Asaram’s Plea Seeking Sentence Suspension

The Supreme Court on Friday sought a response from the Gujarat government regarding self-styled godman…

7 minutes ago

SC Issues Notice On Manish Sisodia Plea Seeking Relaxation Of Bail Conditions

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notices to the Central Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement…

39 minutes ago

SC Stays Disqualification Of 6 CPS In HP Govt

The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily halted the disqualification process of 6 Chief Parliamentary Secretaries…

59 minutes ago

A.R. Rahman, Saira Banu’s Lawyer Vandana Shah Reveals Reasons For Divorce

Renowned music composer A.R. Rahman and his wife, Saira Banu, recently announced their separation after…

1 hour ago

SC To Decide On Transfer Of Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath Disputes To Allahabad HC

The Supreme Court on Friday is examining a plea seeking to transfer 15 pending cases…

1 hour ago

Rajasthan HC Quashes SC/ST Case Against Actress Shilpa Shetty

The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday quashed a complaint filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of…

21 hours ago