States High court

Allahabad HC Takes Strong Action Against Assault on Litigants, Contempt Notices against 10 Advocates

In response to the assault of litigants at the district court, the Allahabad High Court has issued criminal contempt notices to ten advocates, while also barring their entry into the district court premises. This action follows the submission of a report by the district judge concerning the incident.

Barred from Entering Court

Previously, on April 30, the high court had already prohibited two lawyers from accessing the district court premises due to their alleged involvement in the same altercation. The incident occurred on April 29, when several advocates entered the senior division court within the district court premises and purportedly assaulted a litigant.

In delivering its ruling, a bench of Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Mohd Azhar Husain Idrisi emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, “The incident in this case must be regarded with the utmost seriousness. The court cannot permit court proceedings to be disrupted to the extent that litigants are violently attacked within the courtroom, forcing the presiding officer to seek refuge in her chambers for safety.”

“The aggressive and violent behavior displayed within the court premises threatens to undermine the entire judicial system. This court cannot idly stand by while such events unfold. A clear and unwavering message must be conveyed to those engaging in such reprehensible conduct that such incidents will not be tolerated and will be met with severe consequences,” the bench asserted.

HC Direction to the Police

Furthermore, the high court called upon the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, to ensure the provision of adequate police force as directed by the district judge to facilitate the smooth functioning of the court. Additionally, the Commissioner of Police was instructed to authorize a responsible officer, not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Police, to ascertain the criminal history of all individuals named in the contempt notices. The court also mandated the disclosure of the status of the investigation or any actions taken in this matter in its order.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago