States High court

Allahabad High Court on the Importance of Keeping Track of Wedding Presents

The Allahabad High Court recently drew attention to a seeming disregard for a regulation outlined in the Dowry Prohibition (Maintenance of Lists of Presents to the Bride and Bridegroom) Rules, 1985. This rule mandates couples to maintain a list of wedding gifts they receive, as highlighted in the case of Ankit Singh And 3 Others v. State of UP and Another. Justice Vikram D Chauhan observed that parties involved in cases alleging dowry demands were failing to submit such lists with their petitions.

The single-judge emphasized the need for strict adherence to Section 3(2) of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, to prevent citizens from becoming embroiled in baseless legal disputes.

Here’s the case in brief:

  • The court clarified that presents exchanged during marriage are exempted from dowry laws, but they must be listed to prevent future false accusations.
  • Both the bride and groom are required to sign the list of presents, according to the court.
  • The Dowry Prohibition (Maintenance of Lists of Presents to the Bride and Bridegroom) Rules, 1985 were established by the Central Government to address this issue, recognizing gifts as customary in Indian marriages.
  • The appointment of dowry prohibition officers is mandated by law to ensure compliance, the court emphasized.
  • The state government was questioned about the appointment status of these officers, especially given the rising disputes related to dowry.
  • The court demanded disclosure of orders issued for the enforcement of the Dowry Prohibition (Maintenance of Lists of Presents to the Bride and Bridegroom) Rules, 1985, including the number and level of appointed officers.
  • The state was further instructed to provide information on whether lists of presents are collected by officers during marriages.
  • The court sought clarification on any additional rules passed by the state under the Dowry Prohibition Act.
  • The next hearing for the case is scheduled for May 23, indicating ongoing judicial scrutiny on dowry-related matters.
  • The court’s directives aim to ensure transparency, compliance, and prevention of dowry-related disputes in matrimonial proceedings.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago