States High court

Allahabad High Court Reserves Verdict On Rahul Gandhi’s Plea

The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday reserved its order on a petition filed by Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi challenging a Varanasi sessions court directive that revived proceedings against him over remarks concerning the Sikh community.

Justice Sameer Jain heard the matter and kept the verdict pending. Gandhi had approached the High Court after the sessions court, on July 22, directed a magistrate in Varanasi to reconsider a plea seeking registration of an FIR against him.

Case Background

The sessions court’s order came while hearing a revision petition filed by Nageshwar Mishra. Mishra had alleged that Gandhi, during his visit to the United States, made statements suggesting that Sikhs in India live under an atmosphere of insecurity. According to Mishra, the remarks were provocative and aimed at furthering Gandhi’s political agenda.

The plea further alleged that Gandhi had engaged in similar rhetoric earlier, including during a rally at Ramlila Maidan, Delhi, on December 14, 2019. It claimed the speech fueled propaganda that eventually culminated in the Shaheen Bagh protests, which later saw unrest and violence.

Magistrate’s Earlier Rejection

The Varanasi magistrate had initially rejected the plea, citing provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Under Section 208, the court observed, any alleged offence committed outside India cannot be investigated or tried in Indian courts without prior sanction from the Central government.

Court’s Direction

However, the sessions court disagreed with the magistrate’s reasoning, holding that the plea deserved a fresh hearing. It asked the magistrate to consider the matter afresh in light of Supreme Court precedents and then pass an appropriate order.

Rahul Gandhi’s challenge to this directive has now been heard by the Allahabad High Court, which will deliver its decision in due course. The outcome will determine whether the Varanasi magistrate must reopen the plea and reconsider registration of an FIR against the Congress leader.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago