States High court

Allahabad High Court Scraps Mandate For Will Registration

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

In a landmark decision, the Allahabad High Court ruled that the registration of a will is unnecessary in Uttar Pradesh.

The Genesis of This Matter

Since August 23, 2004, the state government has mandated registration for wills. But since this mandate came from the state government, there have been two opposing views. The Shobhnath case set a precedent in the high court, affirming that wills must be registered following the legislation. Conversely, the Jahan Singh case argued that a will’s validity arises posthumously, thus necessitating registration upon its presentation.

To clarify the two opposing viewpoints, the Chief Justice forwarded the reference to the division bench, which summarized the issue as “whether a will reduced into writing prior to August 23, 2004, is required to be compulsorily registered in the event the testator dies after the said date.”.

Court’s Reasoning

The high court’s recent decision, issued on Friday, was in response to a “reference” initiated by the chief justice. This reference stemmed from a plea filed by Pramila Tiwari. In legal terms, a “reference” signifies a scenario where a court is asked to provide its opinion on the validity of a law or regulation. When a court finds that a case hinges on the validity of a legal provision not previously ruled on by a higher court, it must express its opinion on the matter and provide reasons for it. This opinion is then referred to the higher court for consideration.

During the proceedings, the court considered whether the state legislature could legally mandate will registration without the president’s approval. This was because wills, intestacy, and succession fall under the Concurrent List of the Constitution, and there’s already a central law, the Registration Act of 1908, governing will registration.

The division bench of Justice Siddhartha Varma and Justice Ajit Kumar held that Section 169(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act is void. This section mandates the registration of wills. The court held that the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, contradicted the Indian Registration Act of 1908, which held that the registration of wills was optional. The court struck down the said provision and clarified that a will not be considered invalid if it is not registered.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

1 day ago

Supreme Court To Hear Plea To Debar Poll Candidates Charged For Serious Offences On Mar 18

The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea on March 18 that seeks to…

1 day ago

Bombay HC Grants Pension Benefits To Former Judge Pushpa Ganediwala

The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of former Additional Judge Pushpa Ganediwala, granting…

1 day ago

Bombay HC Sets Aside Complaint Against Kailash Kher For Hurting Religious Feelings

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a complaint against singer Kailash Kher, which alleged that…

1 day ago

Uttarakhand HC Stays Proposed Felling Of 3,300 Trees In Shivalik Elephant Reserve

The Uttarakhand High Court has put a temporary halt on the felling of 3,300 trees…

1 day ago

“Notify Posts For Special Education Teachers By March 28”: Supreme Court To States, UTs

The Supreme Court has directed all states and Union Territories to notify the sanctioned posts…

1 day ago