States High court

Bombay HC Asks Existence Of Sensitization Programs For Human Rights Cases

The Bombay High Court recently raised a query to the High Court administration regarding the existence of sensitization programs for judges assigned to hear cases concerning violations of citizens’ human rights.

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Arif Doctor posed this question after Advocate Rahul Nerlekar, representing the High Court administration, highlighted that certain sessions court judges had been designated since the early 2000s to preside over cases related to human rights violations.

During the proceedings, it was disclosed that in 2022, there were only two cases filed and pending before the designated judges: one before a sessions judge in Aurangabad and another before a sessions judge in Sangli. The Bench expressed curiosity as to whether the low number of cases could be attributed to a lack of comprehension regarding what would qualify as a “human rights” case.

Perhaps there are guidelines required on how cognizance can be taken. And elaborate on what kind of cases come under human rights,” the bench stated.

The bench asked the petitioner to conduct research and determine if there was any provision or statutory mandate that would enable the court to issue guidelines in this regard.

“Where do we get the statutory mandate for this? Where does it say that without these rules the (designated) courts cannot function?” it asked.

Advocate Asim Sarode, petitioner-in-person, along with Advocate Ajinkya, contended that the low number of cases might be attributed to a lack of awareness among the public regarding the existence of these specialized courts.

It cannot be that only two cases are pending. I know of cases in various districts where human rights are being violated and courts are refusing to hear. There has to be advertisement that there are such courts. People may not be aware,” he stated.

The Bench additionally instructed Sarode to provide the court with specific details of at least one such case and scheduled further deliberation on the matter for July 27th, 2023.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

9 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

9 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

9 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

9 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

9 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

9 hours ago