States High court

Bombay HC Asks Existence Of Sensitization Programs For Human Rights Cases

The Bombay High Court recently raised a query to the High Court administration regarding the existence of sensitization programs for judges assigned to hear cases concerning violations of citizens’ human rights.

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Arif Doctor posed this question after Advocate Rahul Nerlekar, representing the High Court administration, highlighted that certain sessions court judges had been designated since the early 2000s to preside over cases related to human rights violations.

During the proceedings, it was disclosed that in 2022, there were only two cases filed and pending before the designated judges: one before a sessions judge in Aurangabad and another before a sessions judge in Sangli. The Bench expressed curiosity as to whether the low number of cases could be attributed to a lack of comprehension regarding what would qualify as a “human rights” case.

Perhaps there are guidelines required on how cognizance can be taken. And elaborate on what kind of cases come under human rights,” the bench stated.

The bench asked the petitioner to conduct research and determine if there was any provision or statutory mandate that would enable the court to issue guidelines in this regard.

“Where do we get the statutory mandate for this? Where does it say that without these rules the (designated) courts cannot function?” it asked.

Advocate Asim Sarode, petitioner-in-person, along with Advocate Ajinkya, contended that the low number of cases might be attributed to a lack of awareness among the public regarding the existence of these specialized courts.

It cannot be that only two cases are pending. I know of cases in various districts where human rights are being violated and courts are refusing to hear. There has to be advertisement that there are such courts. People may not be aware,” he stated.

The Bench additionally instructed Sarode to provide the court with specific details of at least one such case and scheduled further deliberation on the matter for July 27th, 2023.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

5 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

5 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

6 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

6 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

7 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

7 hours ago