States High court

Bombay HC Dismisses Plea Against Shiv Sena Leader Anil Desai’s Election As MP

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the election of Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Anil Desai as a Lok Sabha member for the 2024 parliamentary polls.

The court found that the petition “didn’t disclose a cause of action for questioning the election.”

Justice Sharmila Deshmukh ruled against the petition filed by Mahendra Bhingardive, who also contested the Lok Sabha elections. Bhingardive sought to declare the nomination papers of Desai and other candidates invalid, arguing that they were defective and incomplete. He also requested that he be declared the elected candidate for the Mumbai South Central parliamentary constituency.

However, Justice Deshmukh noted that the Returning Officer had thoroughly scrutinized the nomination forms and affidavits, accepting them without identifying any substantial defects.

The judge stated, “Upon my reading of the entire petition, there is not even a whisper as to the manner in which the improper acceptance of nomination has materially affected the election.”

She emphasized that a clear explanation was necessary to establish a cause of action for challenging the election.

The court highlighted that the petition failed to demonstrate the consequences of the alleged defects in the nomination papers and affidavits.

The judgment read, “In the present case, the petition does not have a single averment as to how the alleged lapses/defects are of substantial character and have resulted in a violation of the fundamental right of the citizen to know the true facts and information of the contesting candidate.”

Anil Desai won the Mumbai South Central seat by a significant margin, defeating sitting MP Rahul Shewale from the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena by 53,384 votes, securing a total of 395,138 votes. In contrast, Bhingardive, representing the Right To Recall Party, garnered only 1,444 votes.

Interestingly, over 14,000 voters in the constituency opted for the None Of The Above (NOTA) option.

This ruling underscores the importance of providing substantial grounds when challenging election results. Without clear evidence of how alleged irregularities have affected the election’s outcome, courts are unlikely to entertain such petitions.

The decision also reinforces the validity of the electoral process as conducted by the relevant authorities, paving the way for Anil Desai to continue serving in the Lok Sabha without further legal challenges on this front.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

DHC Seeks Reply Of Speaker’s Office On MLA Tanwar’s Plea Against Disqualification

The Delhi High Court on Friday has requested a response from the Speaker's office regarding…

10 mins ago

SC Lifts Stay On Gurmeet Ram Rahim’s Trial In Sacrilege Cases

The Supreme Court on Friday has lifted the stay imposed by the Punjab and Haryana…

1 hour ago

Illegal Confinement Case: Relief For Sadhguru; SC Closes Proceedings

The Supreme Court on Friday has dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by a father…

1 hour ago

Seats Reservation For Women In Bar Elections Strengthens Legal Framework

Advocate Sanskriti Shakuntala Gupta, one of the petitioners advocating for women’s reservation at the Bar,…

2 hours ago

SC Acquits Death Row Inmate, Citing Lack of Evidence

The Supreme Court on Thursday has acquitted a death row prisoner convicted of murdering his…

20 hours ago

Remarks On K’taka Minister’s Wife: BLR Court Issues Non-Bailable Warrant Against BJP MLA

A Bengaluru court on Thursday has issued a non-bailable warrant for BJP MLA Basanagouda Patil…

20 hours ago