States High court

Bombay HC Dismisses Plea Against Shiv Sena Leader Anil Desai’s Election As MP

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the election of Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Anil Desai as a Lok Sabha member for the 2024 parliamentary polls.

The court found that the petition “didn’t disclose a cause of action for questioning the election.”

Justice Sharmila Deshmukh ruled against the petition filed by Mahendra Bhingardive, who also contested the Lok Sabha elections. Bhingardive sought to declare the nomination papers of Desai and other candidates invalid, arguing that they were defective and incomplete. He also requested that he be declared the elected candidate for the Mumbai South Central parliamentary constituency.

However, Justice Deshmukh noted that the Returning Officer had thoroughly scrutinized the nomination forms and affidavits, accepting them without identifying any substantial defects.

The judge stated, “Upon my reading of the entire petition, there is not even a whisper as to the manner in which the improper acceptance of nomination has materially affected the election.”

She emphasized that a clear explanation was necessary to establish a cause of action for challenging the election.

The court highlighted that the petition failed to demonstrate the consequences of the alleged defects in the nomination papers and affidavits.

The judgment read, “In the present case, the petition does not have a single averment as to how the alleged lapses/defects are of substantial character and have resulted in a violation of the fundamental right of the citizen to know the true facts and information of the contesting candidate.”

Anil Desai won the Mumbai South Central seat by a significant margin, defeating sitting MP Rahul Shewale from the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena by 53,384 votes, securing a total of 395,138 votes. In contrast, Bhingardive, representing the Right To Recall Party, garnered only 1,444 votes.

Interestingly, over 14,000 voters in the constituency opted for the None Of The Above (NOTA) option.

This ruling underscores the importance of providing substantial grounds when challenging election results. Without clear evidence of how alleged irregularities have affected the election’s outcome, courts are unlikely to entertain such petitions.

The decision also reinforces the validity of the electoral process as conducted by the relevant authorities, paving the way for Anil Desai to continue serving in the Lok Sabha without further legal challenges on this front.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Consensual Sex With Minor Wife Is Rape: Bombay HC Upholds 10-Year Jail For Man

In a landmark ruling, the Bombay High Court has recently confirmed that sexual intercourse with…

1 day ago

SC Directs Centre To Address Menstrual Hygiene Issues In Schools

The Supreme Court on Saturday has directed the Centre to address concerns raised by the…

2 days ago

Money Laundering Case: Delhi Court Grants Regular Bail To Businessman Rajesh Katyal

Businessman Rajesh Katyal, who was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate for allegedly laundering over Rs.200…

2 days ago

CJI Sanjiv Khanna Supports Minimum Stipend For Junior Lawyers

Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna on Friday expressed strong support for the Bar Council…

2 days ago

Appointment Of CPS: HP Govt Moves SC Against HC Order

The Himachal Pradesh government has approached the Supreme Court seeking authorization for the appointment of…

2 days ago

Delhi Court Seeks Police Response On Bibhav Kumar’s Petition Challenging Charge Sheet

Delhi's Tis Hazari Court has issued a notice to the Delhi Police on a revision…

2 days ago