States High court

Bombay High Court Extends Temporary Relief for Rahul Gandhi in Defamation Case

The Bombay High Court has prolonged the temporary relief granted to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, and sparing him from appearing before a magistrate court in Mumbai until February 26 in connection with a defamation case.

Rahul Gandhi’s lawyer Kushal Mor, had petitioned the Bombay High Court to dismiss the proceedings related to his “commander-in-thief” comment against Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2018 during a public rally in Rajasthan. This remark was also posted on Gandhi’s Twitter account on September 24, 2018.

A BJP worker named Mahesh Shrishrimal, residing in Girgaon, alleged that Gandhi’s statement labeled the Prime Minister as a “commander-in-thief,” insinuating theft against all BJP members and Indian citizens. Shrishrimal filed a defamation suit in the Magistrate court, which, after hearing his plea, issued a process and summoned Gandhi.

Niteen Pradhan, the complainant’s advocate, was absent in court, and his junior sought an accommodation before Justice NJ Jamadar’s bench.

Upon learning of this, Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, representing Gandhi, requested an extension of the previously granted relief, a request the bench approved.

In Gandhi’s plea to the Bombay High Court, he argued that, as an elected representative, he often faces baseless litigation driven by political motives. Gandhi contended that the magistrate’s court plea was a harassment tactic aimed at tarnishing his public image.

In response, Shrishrimal asserted that he had established a prima facie case against Gandhi, and the magistrate issued the summons only after being satisfied. He emphasized that Gandhi could have challenged the magistrate court’s order through a revision application before the Sessions Court instead of directly seeking quashing in the high court.

In a prior hearing, the High Court directed the Girgaum Magistrate court to postpone the case’s hearing until the next high court session, and subsequent hearings have consistently extended this relief.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago