States High court

Bombay High Court Extends Temporary Relief for Rahul Gandhi in Defamation Case

The Bombay High Court has prolonged the temporary relief granted to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, and sparing him from appearing before a magistrate court in Mumbai until February 26 in connection with a defamation case.

Rahul Gandhi’s lawyer Kushal Mor, had petitioned the Bombay High Court to dismiss the proceedings related to his “commander-in-thief” comment against Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2018 during a public rally in Rajasthan. This remark was also posted on Gandhi’s Twitter account on September 24, 2018.

A BJP worker named Mahesh Shrishrimal, residing in Girgaon, alleged that Gandhi’s statement labeled the Prime Minister as a “commander-in-thief,” insinuating theft against all BJP members and Indian citizens. Shrishrimal filed a defamation suit in the Magistrate court, which, after hearing his plea, issued a process and summoned Gandhi.

Niteen Pradhan, the complainant’s advocate, was absent in court, and his junior sought an accommodation before Justice NJ Jamadar’s bench.

Upon learning of this, Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, representing Gandhi, requested an extension of the previously granted relief, a request the bench approved.

In Gandhi’s plea to the Bombay High Court, he argued that, as an elected representative, he often faces baseless litigation driven by political motives. Gandhi contended that the magistrate’s court plea was a harassment tactic aimed at tarnishing his public image.

In response, Shrishrimal asserted that he had established a prima facie case against Gandhi, and the magistrate issued the summons only after being satisfied. He emphasized that Gandhi could have challenged the magistrate court’s order through a revision application before the Sessions Court instead of directly seeking quashing in the high court.

In a prior hearing, the High Court directed the Girgaum Magistrate court to postpone the case’s hearing until the next high court session, and subsequent hearings have consistently extended this relief.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

14 mins ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

35 mins ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

1 hour ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

1 hour ago

“Not All Private Properties Can Be Acquired Under Article 39(b)”: SC

A 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling on Tuesday regarding the…

2 hours ago

Karnataka HC Notices CM On Plea To Transfer MUDA Case To CBI

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and…

3 hours ago