Bombay HC Orders 2 YouTubers To Delete ‘Defamatory’ Videos Against BJP Minister Girish Mahajan

Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has directed the removal of 6 YouTube videos that allegedly make defamatory claims against Maharashtra Water Resources Minister and senior BJP leader Girish Mahajan.

The court observed that the content was prima facie defamatory and warranted urgent interim relief.

Justice Arif Doctor, while passing the order on May 8, said, “The statements made by defendants in the videos, as discerned from the transcripts are in my prima facie view per se defamatory.”

Interim Relief Granted

The court directed the defendants—YouTuber and journalist Anil Thatte and another individual named Shyam Giri—to immediately delete the six flagged videos. They have also been restrained from uploading any further videos or posts that could defame the minister.

The matter is now scheduled for further hearing on June 20.

Mahajan Alleges Reckless, False Allegations

The order came in response to a defamation suit filed by Mahajan, who claimed the duo had circulated “false, reckless and unsubstantiated” content targeting him. His legal team, led by senior counsel Ravi Kadam, argued that the videos contained baseless accusations, including comments about Mahajan’s alleged conduct with a lady IAS officer.

Kadam told the court that the statements in question were not only false but also maliciously intended to damage the minister’s public image.

YouTube Channels Named In The Suit

Five of the six videos were posted on the YouTube channel Anil Gaganbhedi Thatte, run by Anil Thatte, while the sixth video appeared on a separate channel titled Mudda Bharat Ka, operated by Shyam Giri. Both platforms have now been barred from further posting defamatory content related to the minister.

Court Takes A Firm Stand On Online Defamation

The ruling highlights the judiciary’s growing willingness to clamp down on online content that crosses legal boundaries. By ordering swift takedown and future restrictions, the court has reinforced the seriousness of digital defamation and the need for accountability on social media platforms.

The case will continue on June 20, when the court is expected to further examine the matter and determine whether permanent relief should be granted.