States High court

Bombay HC Orders Maha Police Officer To Pay Rs.2 Lakh To Man For Illegal Arrest

The Bombay High Court has recently ordered a Maharashtra police officer to pay Rs.2 lakh in compensation to a man he illegally arrested.

Additionally, a police constable, who filed the complaint in the case, has been directed to pay Rs.50,000 to his estranged brother-in-law, who was unlawfully detained.

The ruling came from a bench of Justices Vibha Kankanwadi and S.G. Chapalgaonkar while reviewing a petition aimed at quashing an FIR registered in Hingoli in June. The FIR included charges of defamation, sending offensive material, and dishonestly receiving a stolen computer under Sections 66-A and 66-B of the Information Technology Act.

The bench highlighted that the charge of sending offensive material had been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. They also noted that the charge of retaining a stolen computer was not applicable in this situation.

Despite the inapplicability of these sections, the petitioner was arrested shortly after midnight on August 6, 2024, and was granted bail the same day after being presented in a Magistrate’s court.

The court expressed its disbelief that the Investigating Officer did not consider the relevant legal sections before making the arrest. “It is beyond imagination that before the arrest, the Investigating Officer will not apply his mind to which sections are invoked, what the prescribed punishment is, and whether he can legally arrest in such situations,” the court stated.

It emphasized that realizing the wrongfulness of the charges after an arrest would be akin to professional suicide for an Investigating Officer.

Furthermore, the bench pointed out that the investigating officer failed to provide a reason for the arrest, which is required when charges carry a potential punishment of less than seven years. The grounds for the arrest were also not communicated to the petitioner.

The background of the case involves a divorce proceeding between the petitioner and his estranged wife. She had accused him of marital cruelty and claimed that he sent a message to a relative alleging she had made intimate videos, which her brother subsequently shared.

The estranged wife’s brother, a police constable in Hingoli, then filed the defamation case.

This ruling underscores the importance of lawful procedures in arrests and the consequences of failing to adhere to legal standards. The court’s decision aims to hold officers accountable for unlawful actions, thereby reinforcing the rule of law in the region.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Chhath Puja Row: Delhi HC Refuses To Allow Puja At Bank Of Yamuna

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday denied permission to conduct Chhath Puja rituals on the…

7 mins ago

Atishi’s Counsel Seeks Time To File Rejoinder To Complainant’s Reply

The Rouse Avenue Court on Wednesday has granted time for Delhi Chief Minister Atishi Marlena's…

27 mins ago

SC Orders Ajit Pawar NCP To Issue Disclaimer On Clock Symbol Case Within 36 Hours

The Supreme Court on Wednesday has ordered the Ajit Pawar-led faction in Maharashtra to publish…

31 mins ago

Assam Court Orders Registration Of FIR Against IAS Officer

The Nalbari district court in Assam has recently ordered the registration of an FIR against…

48 mins ago

Sanjauli Mosque Row: Court Denies Stay On Order To Demolish Construction, Next Hearing On Nov 11

The issue of illegal construction at a mosque in Sanjauli, the largest suburb of Shimla,…

2 hours ago

Cal HC Directs WB Govt To Ensure Peace In All Localities During Festive Season

The Calcutta High Court directed the West Bengal government on Wednesday to take all necessary…

2 hours ago