States High court

Bombay HC Questions Mumbai University on Online Exams for 7/11 Train Blast Convict

On July 11, 2006, seven bombs exploded in the coaches of different local trains in Mumbai, killing 189 people and wounding 824 others. Ansari and other defendants in the bombing case were found guilty by a special court in September 2015.

Facts of the Case

In 2015, Ansari was granted permission by the court to pursue a law degree course. Eight years later, in 2023, he received approval to sit for the first semester exams. The saga continued in May, when Ansari sought permission to physically attend the second-semester law examinations at Siddharth Law College in South Mumbai, scheduled from May 3 to May 15. The court granted his request and directed the Nashik central prison authorities to facilitate his transportation to the college on exam dates.

However, on May 10, Ansari filed an application stating his inability to appear for exams held on May 3 and 9. The prosecution explained that, despite sincere efforts by the prison authorities, logistical challenges prevented Ansari from reaching the college on time. Consequently, the court instructed the prison superintendent to provide an affidavit by June 5, detailing the reasons for the delay. Considering Ansari’s predicament and security concerns, the court deliberated on the possibility of allowing him to take the exams online. Mumbai University, however, clarified that such a provision did not exist.

Court’s Verdict

Mohammed Sajid Marghoob Ansari, the candidate, might have the opportunity to take his exams online due to security concerns, as indicated by a division bench of Justices Makarand Karnik and Kamal Khata on Friday. Despite this, the High Court deliberated on the feasibility of online exams for Ansari, instructing the university to clarify its position on online examination procedures after consulting relevant authorities, including the ATS. Moreover, the court inquired about the possibility of rescheduling the missed exams, considering circumstances beyond Ansari’s control. The case is set for a further hearing on June 10.

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Consensual Sex With Minor Wife Is Rape: Bombay HC Upholds 10-Year Jail For Man

In a landmark ruling, the Bombay High Court has recently confirmed that sexual intercourse with…

2 days ago

SC Directs Centre To Address Menstrual Hygiene Issues In Schools

The Supreme Court on Saturday has directed the Centre to address concerns raised by the…

2 days ago

Money Laundering Case: Delhi Court Grants Regular Bail To Businessman Rajesh Katyal

Businessman Rajesh Katyal, who was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate for allegedly laundering over Rs.200…

2 days ago

CJI Sanjiv Khanna Supports Minimum Stipend For Junior Lawyers

Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna on Friday expressed strong support for the Bar Council…

2 days ago

Appointment Of CPS: HP Govt Moves SC Against HC Order

The Himachal Pradesh government has approached the Supreme Court seeking authorization for the appointment of…

2 days ago

Delhi Court Seeks Police Response On Bibhav Kumar’s Petition Challenging Charge Sheet

Delhi's Tis Hazari Court has issued a notice to the Delhi Police on a revision…

2 days ago