States High court

Bombay HC Rebukes 2 Lawyers And Their Clients For Deceiving Court In Bail Case

The Bombay High Court recently reprimanded two lawyers and their respective clients for deceiving the Court in a bail case.

Justice SG Mehare of the Aurangabad Bench expressed concern over the degradation of the legal profession in this matter.

The Court highlighted how litigants had influenced the profession and how lawyers, disregarding their own careers, were providing result-oriented services solely to appease clients. The Court raised serious questions about whom to trust in such situations, noting that even junior lawyers were involved in such practices under the guidance of their seniors.

The case involved a bail plea for an accused charged under Sections 299 (culpable homicide) and 307 (attempt to murder) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). On June 14, the complainant’s counsel appeared claiming to represent the complainant, and was given time to make submissions. However, the counsel later submitted an affidavit on behalf of an eyewitness instead of the complainant. Notably, the affidavit did not object to granting bail to the accused. The Court observed that the lawyer had received the affidavit in advance, concluding that it was an attempt to mislead the Court by the lawyers and the eyewitness to secure bail.

The Court found the lawyers’ conduct to be misconduct and referred the matter to the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG) for appropriate action. Considering the unconditional apology tendered by both lawyers, along with their request to not proceed with the inquiry due to potential harm to their professional lives, the Court recalled its order for an inquiry. However, the Court retained its earlier observations on record. The written apology of the lawyers was sealed and made part of the court records.

Advocate Abhaysinh K Bhosle represented the bail applicant, while Assistant Public Prosecutor (APP) VN Patil-Jadhav appeared for the respondent-State, and Advocate Shardul G Shinde assisted APP Patil-Jadhav, representing the complainant.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago