States High court

Bombay HC Rebukes 2 Lawyers And Their Clients For Deceiving Court In Bail Case

The Bombay High Court recently reprimanded two lawyers and their respective clients for deceiving the Court in a bail case.

Justice SG Mehare of the Aurangabad Bench expressed concern over the degradation of the legal profession in this matter.

The Court highlighted how litigants had influenced the profession and how lawyers, disregarding their own careers, were providing result-oriented services solely to appease clients. The Court raised serious questions about whom to trust in such situations, noting that even junior lawyers were involved in such practices under the guidance of their seniors.

The case involved a bail plea for an accused charged under Sections 299 (culpable homicide) and 307 (attempt to murder) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). On June 14, the complainant’s counsel appeared claiming to represent the complainant, and was given time to make submissions. However, the counsel later submitted an affidavit on behalf of an eyewitness instead of the complainant. Notably, the affidavit did not object to granting bail to the accused. The Court observed that the lawyer had received the affidavit in advance, concluding that it was an attempt to mislead the Court by the lawyers and the eyewitness to secure bail.

The Court found the lawyers’ conduct to be misconduct and referred the matter to the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG) for appropriate action. Considering the unconditional apology tendered by both lawyers, along with their request to not proceed with the inquiry due to potential harm to their professional lives, the Court recalled its order for an inquiry. However, the Court retained its earlier observations on record. The written apology of the lawyers was sealed and made part of the court records.

Advocate Abhaysinh K Bhosle represented the bail applicant, while Assistant Public Prosecutor (APP) VN Patil-Jadhav appeared for the respondent-State, and Advocate Shardul G Shinde assisted APP Patil-Jadhav, representing the complainant.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

8 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

8 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

9 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

9 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

10 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

10 hours ago