States High court

Bombay HC Rejects Pleas Against Renaming of Aurangabad & Osamanabad

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday rejected a batch of petitions challenging the State Government’s decision to rename Aurangabad district as Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and Osmanabad as Dharashiv.

A bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Arif Doctor stated that the Maharashtra Government’s notification does not warrant any interference.

“We have no hesitation to hold that the notification issued by the state government Aurangabad and Osmanabad does not suffer from any illegality or any legal vice,” the bench stated.

The court further stated that the petitions are devoid of merits and consequently dismissed them.

Back to 2022

In 2022, under the leadership of Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, the Maharashtra cabinet approved the renaming of Aurangabad to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and Osmanabad to Dharashiv.

On July 16, 2022, a Government Resolution was passed by the two-member cabinet for changing the names, which was subsequently forwarded to the central government.

Centre’s Approval

In February 2023, the Union Home Ministry issued a no objection letter for the name changes, following which a gazette notification was issued by the state government altering the names of Aurangabad and Osmanabad.

Subsequently, numerous petitions were filed by residents of Aurangabad challenging the government’s decision to rename the city as Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar.

Another PIL was filed by 17 Osmanabad residents against the government’s decision to rename it as Dharashiv.

Both petitions characterized the government’s decision as “politically motivated.”

The Maharashtra government countered the pleas, asserting that the renaming was based on the historical significance of the two places and not driven by political reasons.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Shahi Idgah Dispute: Allahabad HC Seeks Muslim Side Response On Plea

The Allahabad High Court, on Wednesday, sought a response from the Muslim side concerning a…

8 hours ago

Corbett Illegal Construction: SC Raps U’khand For Acting Against Top Officers At ‘Snail’s Pace’

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday expressed strong disapproval of the Uttarakhand government's "snail's…

8 hours ago

Delhi High Court Stays BFI’s March 7 Circular On Election Representation

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday temporarily stayed the Boxing Federation of India's March 7…

9 hours ago

Migrant Workers’ Case: SC Raises Concerns Over Ration Card Misuse, Warns They Have Turned Into ‘Popularity Cards’

Ration cards are now being used as 'popularity cards,' said Justice Surya Kant, in an…

9 hours ago

“F-1 Visa: How Students Can Stay Compliant & Avoid Deportation”

The Trump administration's recent escalation of immigration enforcement, particularly targeting foreign nationals associated with pro-Palestinian…

9 hours ago

Delhi HC Seeks Centre Response After PIL Demands Closure Of Abattoirs Near IGI Airport

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Central government regarding a…

11 hours ago