States High court

Cal HC Impedes WB Govt From Selling Immovable Properties In KMC

The Calcutta High Court has recently restrained the West Bengal government from selling, transferring, or assigning any immovable properties within the Kolkata Municipal Corporation limits in connection with an arbitration award involving Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd.

The injunction was issued in response to an application by Essex Development Investments (Mauritius) Limited, which seeks to execute a portion of the award, claiming over ₹2,171.87 crore owed to HPL.

Justice Shampa Sarkar also barred the West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Limited (WBIDC) from selling or transferring its office premises located at 23 Camac Street, Kolkata. The court ordered principal officers of the award debtors to submit affidavits detailing their assets within 2 weeks.

The interim order will remain in effect until February 28, 2025, with the next hearing scheduled for January 3, 2025.

Background of the Dispute

The arbitration dispute centers on tax incentives assured to Essex Development Investments as part of a share purchase agreement (SPA). Essex, part of The Chatterjee Group, acquired the West Bengal government’s shares in HPL on March 1, 2014, to revive the petrochemical company.

Under the SPA, the West Bengal government promised tax incentives, which were to continue even after the introduction of the GST regime on July 1, 2017, based on GST revenue accruing to the state.

Despite the agreement, the government halted incentive payments post-GST implementation, prompting Essex to initiate arbitration proceedings against the state and WBIDC. An arbitral tribunal later awarded Essex compensation, which the West Bengal government appealed unsuccessfully before the Supreme Court.

On November 11, 2023, the apex court declined to entertain the state’s appeal, upholding the award.

Court’s Directions

Justice Sarkar’s order aims to secure Essex’s claim by freezing the sale or transfer of government assets within KMC limits and WBIDC’s office premises. This move safeguards the assets until the arbitration award is executed or further court orders are passed.

The dispute highlights the complexities of contractual obligations in the context of shifting tax regimes and underscores the necessity for clarity in agreements involving public entities.

As the legal proceedings progress, the case will likely remain a focal point for corporate and governance stakeholders.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Bushra Bibi Faces Non-Bailable Arrest Warrant In GBP 190 Million Case

A Rawalpindi accountability court has recently issued non-bailable arrest warrants for Bushra Bibi, wife of…

31 minutes ago

Kerala HC Slams LDF & UDF’s Wayanad ‘Hartals’ As ‘Unacceptable’

The Kerala High Court has recently sharply criticized both the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF)…

1 hour ago

“Don’t Get Carried Away By ‘WhatsApp University’ Messages”: SC Justice KV Viswanathan

Supreme Court Justice KV Viswanathan on Saturday raised concerns about the increasing spread of misinformation,…

2 hours ago

NGT Notes ‘Chaotic Aftermath’ Of Diljit Concert, Directs Immediate Restoration Of JLN Stadium

The National Green Tribunal has recently directed immediate restoration of the Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium following…

2 hours ago

Delhi HC Confutes BSNL’s Decision To Rescind Contract With IT Company

The Delhi High Court has recently annulled BSNL’s decision to cancel a purchase order it…

3 hours ago

“Delhi’s Illegal Hotel Borewell Sealing Drive To Continue”: Authorities Informs NGT

Authorities in Delhi have on Saturday informed the National Green Tribunal that the operation to…

3 hours ago