Categories: States High court

Calcutta HC Dismisses Proceedings Against DSP Accused Of Harassing Colleague During Departmental Probe

The Calcutta High Court recently dismissed criminal proceedings against a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), on the ground that the charges levelled against him did not constitute a cognizable offence under the Indian Criminal Code (IPC).

A single judge bench of Justice Rai Chattopadhyay was hearing the matter.

The DSP was charged under sections 406 (Punishment for criminal breach of trust) and 420 (Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property) of the IPC.

Abhijit Saha filed a complaint against three people, including the petitioner, alleging that he was the subject of a departmental inquiry based on vexatious claims. He further alleged that the petitioner, as the inquiry officer in the departmental procedures, humiliated him on several occasions while being helped by the other accused person, and urged the other accused person to lie in the investigation against him. It was also claimed that he had been threatened with bogus implications.

The complainant was interrogated by the Siliguri Trial Court under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. By decision dated 30 May 2022, it issued summons against the petitioner under sections 420 & 406 of the IPC, observing that a prima facie case had been put out against the petitioner.

The petitioner, who was dissatisfied with the trial court’s findings, moved the high court under Section 482 of the CrPC.

According to the bench, the petitioner must have had the purpose to conduct fraudulent misappropriation of any property entrusted to him by the complainant in order to be guilty of an offence under Section 406 of the IPC.

Furthermore, the single bench added, “There are no charges of inducement or inducement for the purpose of deception of the complainant, or any culpability of the present petitioner’s desire to fraudulently misappropriate any of the complainant’s entrusted possessions.”

“The Court cannot but be constrained to observe, with frustration and hopelessness, that the Trial Court’s finding of a prima facie case having been made out against the present petitioner suffers from the brazen perfunctory and negligent discourse of the power vested in the Trial Court by law,” the bench stated.

“A person may be emotionally offended by another person’s behaviour or conduct, but not every such action would amount to being responsible or criminal until satisfied to be so,” it added.

As a result of the aforesaid conclusions, the single bench dismissed the case.

 

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Rajasthan HC Quashes SC/ST Case Against Actress Shilpa Shetty

The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday quashed a complaint filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of…

19 hours ago

Allahabad HC Turns Down Appeal Seeking Appointment Of Receiver For Jaigurudev Sanstha

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday has dismissed an appeal filed by the Jaigurudev Dharma…

19 hours ago

Shivaji Statue Collapse Case: Bombay HC Grants Bail To Consultant Chetan Patil

The Bombay High Court granted bail to consultant Chetan Patil on Thursday in connection with…

19 hours ago

Excise Policy Case: Delhi HC Refuses To Stay Trial Against Arvind Kejriwal

The Delhi High Court on Thursday declined to stay the trial proceedings against former Delhi…

20 hours ago

AP Assembly Passes Resolution To Set Up HC Bench In Kurnool

The Andhra Pradesh Assembly on Thursday passed a resolution to establish a permanent High Court…

20 hours ago

Lesbian Couple Desiring Child Gets Bail In Kidnapping Of Minor Girl

The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted bail to a lesbian couple arrested for allegedly…

21 hours ago