States High court

Calcutta HCBA Rescinds Boycott Decision Following Judge’s Reconciliation Efforts

On December 21, the Calcutta High Court Bar Association reversed its decision to abstain from attending Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay’s court after the judge visited the association’s office and engaged in discussions with the present lawyers, as informed by its secretary Biswabrata Basu Mallik.

Earlier, the association had communicated to Chief Justice T S Sivagnanam, expressing that its members would refrain from participating in Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay’s bench starting from Tuesday.

This decision was based on the claim that a lawyer had been “mistreated” by the judge and placed in civil custody for contempt of court during a hearing.

As per the high court website’s listing of matters, Justice Gangopadhyay’s bench did not convene on both Tuesday and Wednesday.

On Thursday, during the lunch recess, Justice Gangopadhyay visited the Bar association’s room on the high court premises and engaged in dialogue with the lawyers present, including the concerned lawyer, Prosenjit Mukherjee, and other advocate members of the Bar, according to Mallik’s statement to reporters.

Mallik asserted that the judge, acknowledging the upcoming new year, conveyed a message of letting go of past grievances and embracing a fresh start.

In light of this candid expression, the general body of the Bar decided to resume attending his court from the afternoon session onward.

Responding to a letter from lawyer Prosenjit Mukherjee, who claimed to have been sent to civil custody by Justice Gangopadhyay for contempt of court, a division bench of the high court had granted an interim stay on the order on Monday.

The division bench noted that the single judge’s order had not yet been uploaded on the official server.

Mukherjee had informed the division bench that he was released later in the day from the custody under the Sheriff’s authority but expressed concerns that the three-day civil imprisonment order, if implemented, might subject him to custody again.

In a letter to the chief justice on Monday, Mallik had communicated that the majority of its members had resolved not to attend Justice Gangopadhyay’s court in light of the incident.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

1 min ago

“Not All Private Properties Can Be Acquired Under Article 39(b)”: SC

A 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling on Tuesday regarding the…

28 mins ago

Karnataka HC Notices CM On Plea To Transfer MUDA Case To CBI

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and…

2 hours ago

Delhi HC Dismisses PIL For Councillors’ Fund Increase, Advises Raising Of Issue In MCD House

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation filed by MCD Councillor…

2 hours ago

“States Can’t Seize All Private Properties For Common Good”: SC

In a landmark 7:2 ruling on Tuesday, the Supreme Court declared that states do not…

2 hours ago

“Judicial Independence Isn’t Just Delivering Anti-Government Verdicts”: CJI DY Chandrachud

Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has recently emphasized that judicial independence doesn't equate to consistently ruling…

3 hours ago