States High court

Calcutta HCBA Rescinds Boycott Decision Following Judge’s Reconciliation Efforts

On December 21, the Calcutta High Court Bar Association reversed its decision to abstain from attending Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay’s court after the judge visited the association’s office and engaged in discussions with the present lawyers, as informed by its secretary Biswabrata Basu Mallik.

Earlier, the association had communicated to Chief Justice T S Sivagnanam, expressing that its members would refrain from participating in Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay’s bench starting from Tuesday.

This decision was based on the claim that a lawyer had been “mistreated” by the judge and placed in civil custody for contempt of court during a hearing.

As per the high court website’s listing of matters, Justice Gangopadhyay’s bench did not convene on both Tuesday and Wednesday.

On Thursday, during the lunch recess, Justice Gangopadhyay visited the Bar association’s room on the high court premises and engaged in dialogue with the lawyers present, including the concerned lawyer, Prosenjit Mukherjee, and other advocate members of the Bar, according to Mallik’s statement to reporters.

Mallik asserted that the judge, acknowledging the upcoming new year, conveyed a message of letting go of past grievances and embracing a fresh start.

In light of this candid expression, the general body of the Bar decided to resume attending his court from the afternoon session onward.

Responding to a letter from lawyer Prosenjit Mukherjee, who claimed to have been sent to civil custody by Justice Gangopadhyay for contempt of court, a division bench of the high court had granted an interim stay on the order on Monday.

The division bench noted that the single judge’s order had not yet been uploaded on the official server.

Mukherjee had informed the division bench that he was released later in the day from the custody under the Sheriff’s authority but expressed concerns that the three-day civil imprisonment order, if implemented, might subject him to custody again.

In a letter to the chief justice on Monday, Mallik had communicated that the majority of its members had resolved not to attend Justice Gangopadhyay’s court in light of the incident.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

1 day ago

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Lawyer In Brother’s Criminal Case

The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…

2 days ago

Justice Madan B Lokur Appointed As Chairperson of UN Internal Justice Council

Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…

2 days ago

Karnataka High Court Directs NLSIU To Implement 0.5% Reservation For Transgender Persons

The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Directs UP Vigilance To Investigate Himalayan Cooperative Housing Land Issue

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Grants Stay On Mohammed Zubair’s Arrest In Religious Enmity Case

The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…

2 days ago