States High court

Calcutta High Court: ‘Sweety’ and ‘Baby’ Context Matters, Not Always Sexual Remarks

The Calcutta High Court recently emphasized that terms like ‘Sweety’ and ‘Baby’ used to address women aren’t always sexually charged, highlighting their common usage in certain social contexts. Additionally, the court cautioned against the misuse of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (POSH) Act, noting its potential to exacerbate barriers for women in the workplace.

These remarks were made by Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya in a case concerning allegations of sexual harassment.

Here’s what happened:

  • Allegations of Sexual Harassment: A female employee of the Coast Guard accused her senior officer of sexual harassment, citing various incidents, including the use of terms like ‘Sweety’ and ‘Baby’ to address her.
  • Complainant’s Assertion: The complainant contended that these terms were used with sexual undertones, causing her discomfort.
  • Officer’s Defense: The accused officer denied using the terms in a sexually coloured manner and ceased using them once the complainant expressed discomfort.
  • Court’s Observation on ICC’s Finding: The High Court noted the ICC’s view that the terms were inappropriate but added that they may not always have sexual connotations.
  • Definition of Sexual Harassment: The Court cited the POSH Act’s definition of sexual harassment but noted that the use of terms like ‘Sweety’ and ‘Baby’ may not always qualify as such.
  • Removal of Unwelcome Conduct: The Court observed that the accused stopped using the words after being confronted by the complainant, removing the element of unwelcome conduct.
  • Lack of Witness Corroboration: The Court highlighted the absence of witnesses or CCTV footage to support the complainant’s allegations of inappropriate staring and peeping.
  • Usual Terminology in Coast Guard: The Court dismissed the allegation of sexual innuendo in the phrase ‘hugging the coast,’ considering it as standard terminology in Coast Guard circles.
  • Reservations about Genuineness: Expressing reservations, the Court questioned the timing of the complaint and suggested the possibility of misuse to counter prior charges against the complainant.
  • Dismissal of Writ Petition: The Court dismissed the complainant’s writ petition and upheld the ICC’s decision to absolve the accused officer of wrongdoing.
  • Caution Against Misuse of POSH Act: The Court warned against the misuse of the POSH Act, emphasizing the need to avoid creating obstacles for genuinely competent female employees.
  • Clarification on Pending Criminal Case: The Court clarified that its decision pertained to the writ petition and did not comment on the merits of the criminal case against the accused senior officer.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

6 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

6 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

7 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

7 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

8 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

8 hours ago