States High court

‘Children are not Playthings For Parents’: Patna HC Upholds Family Court Order Allowing Daughter To Live With Father

The Patna High Court recently upheld the grant of custody of a minor child to her father, emphasizing the importance of the child’s welfare.

A bench of Justice Harish Kumar and Justice Ashutosh Kumar was hearing a plea filed by the mother challenging a family court order that determined it was in the best interests of the 6-year-old girl child to remain with her father because her brother was already living with him.

The father was granted custody, while the mother was granted visitation rights once a month during school holidays and festivals.

“Children are not chattels or playthings for the parents. Absolute right of either of the parents over the life and destiny of children has yielded to welfare and balanced growth of children,” the bench noted.

The Court also stated that its decision is not final and will be subject to the child’s wishes in the future.

The husband had filed for divorce because he suspected the wife of infidelity and violence. During the divorce proceedings, the parties mutually agreed to divorce. They agreed that the husband would have custody of their son and the mother would have custody of their daughter, with visitation rights for both parents.

However, the wife remarried within seven days of the divorce, which concerned the girl’s father about the safety of the child in the mother’s custody.

Later, the girl expressed her dissatisfaction with her mother and stepfather, and expressed a desire to live with her brother at her father’s house. The minor girl also claimed that her stepfather touched her inappropriately and that her mother threatened her. A case was pending against the stepfather under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act of 2012.

As a result, the family court granted custody of the daughter to her father in the best interests of the child and in light of the mother’s remarriage.

The Court observed that a girl child would be better raised by her mother under normal circumstances. However, even if the allegations are ultimately proven false, the girl would be better off staying at her father’s house because she would have the company of her brother, according to the report.

“She did not appear to be quite comfortable with the mother. This may be a temporary circumstance; nonetheless a very necessary ground to be factored in for the Family Court to opine and direct that the girl shall stay with her father,” the bench stated

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

46 mins ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

1 hour ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

2 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

2 hours ago

“Not All Private Properties Can Be Acquired Under Article 39(b)”: SC

A 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling on Tuesday regarding the…

2 hours ago

Karnataka HC Notices CM On Plea To Transfer MUDA Case To CBI

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and…

4 hours ago