States High court

CMRL Pay-Off Case: Kerala HC Issues Notices to CM Pinarayi Vijayan & his Daughter

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Kerala High Court on Tuesday directed Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan to respond to Congress MLA Mathew Kuzhalnadan’s plea for an investigation into alleged financial transactions between his daughter’s now defunct IT firm and a private mining company.

A single bench of Justice K Babu also issued notices to Vijayan’s daughter Veena, her defunct firm, and the mining company, seeking their responses on the MLA’s revision petition.

Vigilance Court’s Decision

Mathew Kuzhalnadan approached the high court after a vigilance court dismissed his request for an inquiry against Vijayan regarding the financial dealings between the private mining company and his daughter T Veena’s firm.

The vigilance court concluded that the complaint lacked essential facts constituting corruption. Initially, Kuzhalnadan approached the Special Vigilance Court, claiming that the Vigilance Department had refused to investigate financial transactions between Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd (CMRL) and Veena’s company, Exalogic. Later, he sought a court-monitored investigation into these transactions.

“The allegations in the complaint, even if accepted at face value, do not amount to the alleged offence. The accusations of corruption stem from suspicions and doubts raised by the complainant. However, suspicions and doubts alone do not constitute factual allegations of an offence,” observed the vigilance court.

Political Backlash and Media Reports

The Congress has been targeting the chief minister, his daughter, and the CPI(M) following a report in a Malayalam daily claiming that CMRL paid Rs 1.72 crore to Vijayan’s daughter between 2017 and 2020. According to the report, an interim board for settlement ruled on the payments, stating that CMRL had a previous agreement with Veena’s IT firm for consulting and software support services. Allegations also surfaced that payments were made monthly to her firm despite no services being rendered, purportedly due to her relationship with a prominent individual.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Justice Yashwant Varma Denies Allegations Of Cash Found At Residence, Probe Panel Formed

Allegations surrounding a fire at the residence of Delhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma,…

3 hours ago

Delhi Court Dismissed BJP MP Raju Bista’s Defamation Complaint Against MLA Bishnu Sharma

The Rouse Avenue Court on Wednesday declined to take cognizance of a defamation complaint filed…

3 hours ago

Gold Smuggling Scandal: Actress Ranya Rao’s Lawyer Challenges DRI’s Search Consent at Bail Hearing

Actress Ranya Rao, who was caught allegedly smuggling 14.2 kg of gold at Kempegowda International…

4 hours ago

Delhi High Court Allows Withdrawal of PIL Against Yo Yo Honey Singh’s ‘Maniac’ Song

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday permitted the withdrawal of a Public Interest Litigation that…

4 hours ago

Delhi HC Allows Engineer Rashid To Attend Parliament Sessions

The Delhi High Court has granted permission to Engineer Rashid, an independent Member of Parliament…

5 hours ago

Kunal Kamra Row: Mumbai Police To Issue 2nd Summons In ‘Traitor’ Joke Case Today

The Mumbai Police on Wednesday are preparing to issue a second summon to stand-up comedian…

5 hours ago