States High court

Delhi HC Seeks Responses on ‘Manual Scavenging’ Law Efficacy

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday sought responses from both the Centre and the Delhi government on a plea challenging the constitutional validity of various provisions within the law permitting manual scavenging.

The petitioner argues that the legislation creates an “unreasonable classification” between those cleaning sewers and septic tanks manually and those doing so while using protective devices, failing to eliminate the “dehumanizing” practice of manual scavenging.

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora issued notice to the Union Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment and the Delhi government regarding the petition. The court granted eight weeks to the authorities to file their replies and scheduled further hearings for July 4, 2024.

The plea seeks the striking down of several sections of the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 and the relevant Rules, asserting violations of constitutional articles including Article 14, Article 17, Article 21, and Article 23. The petitioner, Kallu, a sewer and septic tank cleaner, demands rehabilitation and benefits for families of those involved in manual scavenging activities.

The petition argues that the Act and Rules permit manual scavenging, perpetuating untouchability and compromising dignity. It criticizes the classification based on the use of protective gear, which denies benefits to manual scavengers who use protective devices. Additionally, it challenges the exclusion of daily wage workers and temporary workers from the definition of manual scavenger.

The plea highlights Section 39 of the Manual Scavenging Act, which allows manual scavenging for six months, tarnishing the law’s objective.

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare
AddThis Website Tools
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

“Wife’s Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty”: Madras HC Turns Down Husband’s Divorce Plea

The Madras High Court rejected man's request for divorce, dismissing his claims that his wife’s…

16 hours ago

Delhi Riots Case: Delhi HC Lists Tasleem Ahmed’s Bail Plea Before Roster Bench

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the bail plea of Tasleem Ahmed for hearing before…

17 hours ago

Omar Abdullah Announces New Assembly, Salary Hike, Final Amnesty & Heritage Push For J&K

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made several significant announcements on Thursday during the…

17 hours ago

UP Court Issues Notice To Rahul Gandhi After Complaint Alleges His Words ‘Hurt Sentiments’

A local court in Sambhal has issued a notice to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, requiring…

17 hours ago

“Grabbing Minor’s Breasts, Breaking Pyjama Strings Doesn’t Qualify As Attempt To Rape”: Allahabad HC

A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court has sparked a critical examination of India's…

18 hours ago

IPL 2025: Saliva Ban Lifted After BCCI Gets Captains’ Nod

The restriction on using saliva to shine the ball will be removed in the 2025…

19 hours ago