States High court

Empathy in Employment: Bombay High Court’s Ruling for Pregnant Workers

In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court underscored the obligation of employers to display empathy towards pregnant employees, emphasizing the importance of granting maternity benefits. The directive came as the court addressed a case involving the Airports Authority of India (AAI) and a woman, who petitioned against the denial of maternity benefits by AAI.

The division bench comprising Justices AS Chandurkar and Jitendra Jain made this assertion while considering the woman’s challenge to the rejection of maternity benefits, which was based on the assertion that she did not meet the eligibility criteria for maternity leave. The case in hand is Airport Authority of India Workers Union & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

Here’s what happened:

  • The Bombay High Court directed the Airports Authority of India (AAI) to provide maternity benefits to a woman, emphasizing the entitlement of female workers to all facilities, regardless of their job duties.
  • The Court stressed the importance of honoring and treating women with dignity in their workplace, recognizing motherhood as a natural aspect of a woman’s life.
  • The petitioner, who secured a job with AAI on compassionate grounds after her husband’s death, gave birth to her third child in 2012 and applied for maternity benefits.
  • AAI rejected her claim, citing her two surviving children as grounds for ineligibility, which the Court deemed unjustifiable.
  • The Court clarified that the Maternity Leave Regulation of 2003 aims to grant maternity leave benefits, not to control population growth.
  • It noted that the condition of two surviving children is to limit maternity benefits to ensure the organization’s operational continuity, not to restrict individual rights.
  • Despite having a child in 2009, the petitioner hadn’t previously applied for maternity benefits, which the Court considered in its decision.
  • The Court concluded that AAI’s denial of maternity benefits was unjustified and ordered them to grant the benefits to the woman.
  • AAI was instructed to comply with the Court’s directive within eight weeks from the date of the ruling.
  • This case underscores the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the rights of pregnant workers and ensuring their fair treatment in the workplace.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

9 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

9 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

10 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

11 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

11 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

12 hours ago