States High court

Gujarat HC Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings Against Senior Counsel for ‘Unparliamentary’ Remarks

The Gujarat High Court has taken suo motu contempt proceedings against senior counsel Percy Kavina for allegedly using “unparliamentary” and “disparaging” words against a sitting judge.

A division bench of Justice AS Supehia and Justice MR Mengedey, invoking Article 215 of the Indian Constitution and the Contempt of Courts Act, initiated the proceedings and directed the registrar general of the High Court to compile a report containing all the relevant details and investigate the senior counsel’s address. However, Senior Counsel Kavina requested the division bench not to proceed with the contempt proceedings and instead allow him to personally apologize to the sitting judge without any conditions.

During the hearing before the division bench, Kavina acknowledged the seriousness of contempt proceedings and expressed his desire to resolve the matter by offering an unconditional apology.

The bench, acknowledging the gravity of the incident that had affected the dignity and majesty of the court, stated that the issue was indeed serious.

Nonetheless, the bench granted Senior Counsel Kavina permission to apologize directly to the single judge, exploring the possibility of resolving the matter. Consequently, Kavina appeared before the single judge and tendered his apology, acknowledging that his remarks were intemperate and had brought disrepute to the judiciary. He further stated that his submissions were unwarranted. As an act of atonement, he declared that he would not appear in the case again.

Pursuant to this, the single judge ordered-

It is the submission of learned senior counsel Mr Percy Kavina to accept his unconditional apology. It is further submitted by learned senior counsel Mr Percy Kavina that only the court concerned can accept or reject the unconditional apology tendered by him… In view of the above submissions, this court is of the opinion that what has happened on 07.07.2023, should not have happened and the words used by learned senior counsel Mr Percy Kavina were derogatory.”

The court noted that since the proposed suo motu contempt proceedings had not yet begun, senior counsel Kavina could approach the respective division bench to seek an unconditional apology. However, as the single judge did not record whether the apology was accepted or not, the matter will be brought before the division bench on July 17.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

3 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

3 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

5 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

5 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

6 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

6 hours ago