States High court

HC Seeks Maha Govt Response on Subramanian Swamy’s Plea Challenging Pandharpur Temples Act

The Bombay High Court on Monday sought the Maharashtra government response on a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, challenging the Pandharpur Temples Act.

Swamy moved the High Court in February this year, contending that the Maharashtra government had assumed control over the administration of temples in Pandharpur town in an arbitrary manner.

A division bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Arif S Doctor directed the government to submit its affidavit and scheduled the case for hearing on September 13, 2023.

As per the plea, the state government, through the Pandharpur Temples Act of 1973, eliminated all hereditary rights and privileges of ministrants and priestly classes in order to oversee the governance and administration of the Lord Vitthal and Rukmini temples in Pandharpur, situated in Solapur district of the state. The law conferred authority upon the state government to manage its administration and financial resources, the plea stated.

During the hearing, Bheemacharya Balacharya, asserting affiliation with the Dharma Rakshak Trust, attempted to intervene in the case. However, the High Court deemed his intervention unnecessary and rejected his application. In his PIL, Swamy stated that he had written to Chief Minister Eknath Shinde in July 2022, highlighting that the temple affairs, encompassing religious offerings and customs, were being “heavily mismanaged.”

He argued that this mismanagement could adversely affect Hindu religious sentiments and the fundamental rights of believers. The former Rajya Sabha member also informed that he had written to then Governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari on December 18, 2022, urging the repeal of the Pandharpur Temples Act.

The PIL emphasized that the government’s control over the Pandharpur temple encroached upon the rights of Hindus to profess, practice, and propagate their religion, as well as to manage Hindu Religious Endowments and related matters of faith. Additionally, the petition noted that the government could assume control over property for a limited period either in the interest of the public or for proper management.

“However, in this case, it was done in perpetuity, rendering it unconstitutional,” the PIL contended.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

5 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

5 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

6 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

6 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

7 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

7 hours ago