States High court

HC Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Traffic Management Issues in Ahmedabad

The Gujarat High Court has taken suo motu cognizance of traffic management issues following a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation’s (AMC) decision to construct a flyover at the Panjarapol junction.

The high court emphasized the urgent need for a comprehensive review of the city’s traffic infrastructure and management. The PIL has exposed several critical problems with Ahmedabad’s road network, particularly on the busy Sarkhej-Gandhinagar (SG) Road.

The court stated, “We find it fit and proper to take a holistic view of the traffic problems being faced by the denizens of Ahmedabad city due to poor or inadequate road infrastructure and mismanagement of traffic. We also find it fit in the interest of justice to take cognizance of the above-referred issues in a suo motu public interest litigation.”

A bench of Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Pranav Trivedi, acknowledged the significance of the issues raised in the writ petition, Dharini Shah vs. State of Gujarat, classifying them as matters of “paramount public importance.” The petition highlighted severe traffic mismanagement and the lack of crucial road infrastructure, including service roads and footbridges.

The division bench also questioned the AMC’s decision-making process regarding the proposed flyover at the Panjarapol junction. It noted potential flaws in the decision, especially given reports from the Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) and IITRAM from 2012, which indicated that the traffic volume at the junction did not justify the construction of a flyover. The reports suggested that there was no significant traffic issue at Panjarapol junction to warrant such a project.

Advocate Pitamber Abhichandani has been appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court). Notices have been issued to various state and Union government authorities, including the AMC, Auda, the state roads and buildings department, the home department, Gujarat DGP, and the National Highways Authority of India.

As an immediate measure, the state chief secretary has been directed to ensure strict adherence to traffic rules. The court has also ordered the identification and marking of accident-prone areas to enhance safety measures.

The case has been scheduled for further hearing on August 22, 2024.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

5 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

5 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

5 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

6 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

6 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

6 hours ago