States High court

High Court Upholds MBBS Degree Despite False Information

The Bombay High Court determined that a student was wrongfully admitted to an MBBS degree program at a renowned college in Mumbai in 2012 under the OBC category using a non-creamy layer certificate. But the High Court recognized the ongoing need for doctors, and despite the wrongful admission, the Bombay High Court chose not to revoke the student’s admission as she had already completed the course.

Facts of the Case

In 2012, a petition was submitted urging an investigation into OBC admissions for MBBS courses using non-creamy layer certificates. An inquiry was subsequently conducted regarding all admitted students. Lubna Mujawar, the petitioner, alleged that her father had misrepresented information by concealing the fact that the student’s mother was employed by the municipal corporation, thereby providing false details.

In February 2014, Lokmanya Tilak Medical College in Sion revoked her admission to the MBBS program. However, the High Court, considering the passage of time and the fact that she completed her course in 2017 under interim orders allowing her to continue her studies, ruled that she should now be granted the degree. Based on the interim orders established since February 2014, the petitioner has successfully completed the MBBS program.

Court’s Ruling

The court emphasized that the petitioner had fulfilled the requirements for the MBBS degree during the period covered by the interim orders, rendering it inappropriate to revoke her qualification. The High Court noted that the student’s admission was secured through false information provided by her father, who failed to disclose that her mother was employed by the municipal corporation.

Consequently, the court expressed that it wouldn’t be suitable to nullify the petitioner’s qualification presently, particularly since they are now deemed capable of practicing medicine. The High Court mandated the student to settle the course expenses as an open category enrollee within three months, along with an extra penalty of Rs 50,000 to be paid to the college.

The division bench of Justices A S Chandurkar and Jitendra Jain concluded that, “In our country, where the ratio of doctors to population is very low” withdrawing her qualification would “be a national loss, as citizens would be deprived of one doctor.”

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

7 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

7 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

7 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

8 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

8 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

8 hours ago