States High court

Husband Has A Moral & Legal Liability To Maintain Wife Even If He Is A Professional Beggar: Punjab & Haryana HC

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Punjab & Haryana High Court recently observed that a husband has a moral & legal liability to maintain his wife who is unable to maintain herself, even if he is a professional beggar.

Justice HS Madaan dismissed a revision plea filed by the husband against an order directing him to pay maintenance to his wife. The Court noted in its order,

“Of course, a husband has got a moral and legal liability to maintain his wife unable to maintain herself, even if he is a professional beggar. The respondent/husband could not establish on record that petitioner wife (herein respondent) has got any means of earning or is possessed of sufficient property.”

Therefore, the court noted that a husband is an able-bodied person and that nowadays, even a manual laborer manages to earn ₹500 or more per day. Further, keeping in view the trend of rising prices, maintenance awarded can’t be said to be on the higher side.

The wife preferred a divorce petition and an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, seeking maintenance from her husband at ₹15,000 per month & litigation expenses of ₹11,000 pending the outcome of the divorce case.

Further, the trial court awarded maintenance at ₹5,000 per month to the respondent-wife during the pendency of the divorce case. It also directed the husband to pay a lump sum of ₹5,500 to his wife as litigation expenses along with ₹500 per hearing on getting marked her presence before the court.

Aggrieved by this order, the husband moved to the High Court.

The High Court while settling with this view that the husband in no way established on record that his wife has any means of earning in order to maintain herself.

Therefore, the Court was of the view that the trial court was justified in granting maintenance as well as litigation expenses. The Court held while dismissing the plea of the husband that “The impugned order passed by the trial Court is quite detailed and well-reasoned and it does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity and is not having any element of arbitrariness or perversity.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Gulmarg Fashion Show: Srinagar Court To Hear Case Against Organizers On April 8

A Srinagar court has scheduled a hearing for April 8, 2025, in connection with the…

14 hours ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Kannada Actress Ranya Rao Moves Sessions Court For Bail

Kannada actress Ranya Rao, arrested last week in connection with a gold smuggling case, has…

14 hours ago

“Advocates Can appear In Confiscation Proceedings Under Forest Act”: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that advocates can represent clients in confiscation cases under…

16 hours ago

Cement Prices Are Likely To Increase Because Of New Mineral Tax By States: Report

Cement prices across various states are expected to increase following a Supreme Court ruling that…

19 hours ago

“Plaint Against Teacher By Parent, Student: First Enquiry, Then Arrest”: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has laid down new guidelines to protect educators from hasty arrests…

22 hours ago

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

3 days ago