States High court

Husband Has A Moral & Legal Liability To Maintain Wife Even If He Is A Professional Beggar: Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab & Haryana High Court recently observed that a husband has a moral & legal liability to maintain his wife who is unable to maintain herself, even if he is a professional beggar.

Justice HS Madaan dismissed a revision plea filed by the husband against an order directing him to pay maintenance to his wife. The Court noted in its order,

“Of course, a husband has got a moral and legal liability to maintain his wife unable to maintain herself, even if he is a professional beggar. The respondent/husband could not establish on record that petitioner wife (herein respondent) has got any means of earning or is possessed of sufficient property.”

Therefore, the court noted that a husband is an able-bodied person and that nowadays, even a manual laborer manages to earn ₹500 or more per day. Further, keeping in view the trend of rising prices, maintenance awarded can’t be said to be on the higher side.

The wife preferred a divorce petition and an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, seeking maintenance from her husband at ₹15,000 per month & litigation expenses of ₹11,000 pending the outcome of the divorce case.

Further, the trial court awarded maintenance at ₹5,000 per month to the respondent-wife during the pendency of the divorce case. It also directed the husband to pay a lump sum of ₹5,500 to his wife as litigation expenses along with ₹500 per hearing on getting marked her presence before the court.

Aggrieved by this order, the husband moved to the High Court.

The High Court while settling with this view that the husband in no way established on record that his wife has any means of earning in order to maintain herself.

Therefore, the Court was of the view that the trial court was justified in granting maintenance as well as litigation expenses. The Court held while dismissing the plea of the husband that “The impugned order passed by the trial Court is quite detailed and well-reasoned and it does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity and is not having any element of arbitrariness or perversity.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago