States High court

‘Jai Shri Ram’ Slogans In Mosque: Karnataka HC Dismisses Charges Against 2 Individuals

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed criminal proceedings against 2 individuals from Dakshina Kannada district, accused of shouting “Jai Shri Ram” slogans inside a mosque.

The incident occurred on September 24, 2023, when the two men reportedly entered a mosque in Aittur village and raised the slogans, prompting a complaint from a local resident, Hyder Ali C M.

Justice M Nagaprasanna, overseeing the case, raised an important question: how could shouting “Jai Shri Ram” be interpreted as an act that outraged religious sentiments? He referenced a Supreme Court ruling, emphasizing that actions which do not disrupt public peace cannot be prosecuted under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

According to the complaint, the two accused were captured on CCTV riding motorcycles around the mosque and shouting slogans late at night. While the complaint highlighted the historically peaceful coexistence of Hindus and Muslims in the area, it claimed the actions of the accused aimed to instigate communal discord.

In the wake of the complaint, Keerthan Kumar and N M Sachin Kumar faced charges of criminal trespass and other offenses under IPC Sections 447, 295A, 505, and 506. However, the defendants challenged these charges, asserting that the legal criteria for such offenses were not met.

The court sided with the defense, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the charges. It stated that entering a mosque, a public space, did not amount to criminal trespass under the law.

Furthermore, the court noted that claims of intimidation were unsupported by direct evidence, and the complaint did not adequately demonstrate the elements of the offenses charged.

In conclusion, the dismissal of these proceedings underscores the importance of evidence in legal cases, particularly concerning allegations that could potentially inflame communal tensions. The court’s ruling reflects a commitment to ensuring that only substantiated claims are pursued within the judicial system, maintaining a focus on public order and peace.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Consensual Sex With Minor Wife Is Rape: Bombay HC Upholds 10-Year Jail For Man

In a landmark ruling, the Bombay High Court has recently confirmed that sexual intercourse with…

1 day ago

SC Directs Centre To Address Menstrual Hygiene Issues In Schools

The Supreme Court on Saturday has directed the Centre to address concerns raised by the…

1 day ago

Money Laundering Case: Delhi Court Grants Regular Bail To Businessman Rajesh Katyal

Businessman Rajesh Katyal, who was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate for allegedly laundering over Rs.200…

1 day ago

CJI Sanjiv Khanna Supports Minimum Stipend For Junior Lawyers

Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna on Friday expressed strong support for the Bar Council…

1 day ago

Appointment Of CPS: HP Govt Moves SC Against HC Order

The Himachal Pradesh government has approached the Supreme Court seeking authorization for the appointment of…

1 day ago

Delhi Court Seeks Police Response On Bibhav Kumar’s Petition Challenging Charge Sheet

Delhi's Tis Hazari Court has issued a notice to the Delhi Police on a revision…

2 days ago