States High court

‘Jai Shri Ram’ Slogans In Mosque: Karnataka HC Dismisses Charges Against 2 Individuals

The Karnataka High Court has dismissed criminal proceedings against 2 individuals from Dakshina Kannada district, accused of shouting “Jai Shri Ram” slogans inside a mosque.

The incident occurred on September 24, 2023, when the two men reportedly entered a mosque in Aittur village and raised the slogans, prompting a complaint from a local resident, Hyder Ali C M.

Justice M Nagaprasanna, overseeing the case, raised an important question: how could shouting “Jai Shri Ram” be interpreted as an act that outraged religious sentiments? He referenced a Supreme Court ruling, emphasizing that actions which do not disrupt public peace cannot be prosecuted under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

According to the complaint, the two accused were captured on CCTV riding motorcycles around the mosque and shouting slogans late at night. While the complaint highlighted the historically peaceful coexistence of Hindus and Muslims in the area, it claimed the actions of the accused aimed to instigate communal discord.

In the wake of the complaint, Keerthan Kumar and N M Sachin Kumar faced charges of criminal trespass and other offenses under IPC Sections 447, 295A, 505, and 506. However, the defendants challenged these charges, asserting that the legal criteria for such offenses were not met.

The court sided with the defense, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the charges. It stated that entering a mosque, a public space, did not amount to criminal trespass under the law.

Furthermore, the court noted that claims of intimidation were unsupported by direct evidence, and the complaint did not adequately demonstrate the elements of the offenses charged.

In conclusion, the dismissal of these proceedings underscores the importance of evidence in legal cases, particularly concerning allegations that could potentially inflame communal tensions. The court’s ruling reflects a commitment to ensuring that only substantiated claims are pursued within the judicial system, maintaining a focus on public order and peace.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Shambhu Border Protest: SC Expresses Concern Over Dallewal’s Health, Says Top Court’s Doors Always Open For Farmers

The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed concern over the health of farmers' leader Dallewal and…

5 hours ago

Delhi HC To Hear Raghav Chadha’s Petition Against Bungalow Eviction On Dec 19

The Delhi High Court will hear AAP MP Raghav Chadha’s plea on December 19, where…

5 hours ago

“Court Open To Farmers’ Suggestions After Rejection Of Punjab Govt Committee”: SC

The Supreme Court on Wednesday stated that its doors were “always open” to the demands…

6 hours ago

Delhi HC Orders Virtual Appearance Of 2 Accused In MCOCA Case Involving Naresh Balyan

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the virtual presence of Rohit and Sachin Chikara,…

7 hours ago

Delhi HC Issues Notice To ED On Leena Paulose’s Bail Plea

The Delhi High Court has issued a notice to the ED regarding the bail application…

8 hours ago

Supreme Court Grants Co-Accused Time To Respond In Yasin Malik Trial Transfer Case

The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted 2 weeks to the co-accused in the Yasin Malik…

9 hours ago