States High court

Jharkhand HC Observes Misuse of Section 498A IPC, Quashes Case Against Husband’s Family

The Jharkhand High Court recently made an observation regarding Section 498A (cruelty to woman) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The court acknowledged that while this section was initially introduced with the commendable purpose of penalizing cruelty perpetrated by husbands or their relatives against married women, it is currently being misused.

A single bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi took note of the fact that several courts, including the Supreme Court, have expressed concerns about this misuse.

“Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was inserted in the statute with the laudable object of punishing cruelty at the hands of husband or his relatives, however, nowadays, the said Section is being misused which has been observed by several High Courts and the Hon’ble Supreme Court,” Justice Dwivedi remarked.

The court noted that concerns have been raised by various courts, including the Supreme Court, regarding the misuse of this section and the disturbing trend of involving the husband’s relatives in matrimonial disputes without considering the potential consequences of such complaints going to trial.

The High Court referred to Supreme Court judgments where the top court had expressed apprehension over cases filed under Section 498A in the heat of the moment, with generalized allegations aimed at implicating the husband’s family members in matrimonial disputes.

The observation was made in response to a plea seeking the quashing of a criminal case filed against Umesh Kumar, Deepti Srivastava, Archna Sinha and Gopal Chandra Sinha (petitioners), who are the family members of a man named Piyush Srivastava, who is accused of being cruel to his estranged wife. The FIR was lodged against the petitioners at the Sahibganj Police Station.

Subsequently, after examining the presence of vague and generalized allegations against the petitioners, the High Court quashed the case against them.

The bench highlighted that the complaint petition did not disclose the specific nature of the alleged torture carried out by the petitioners.

However, the single bench clarified that it did not interfere with the complaint and criminal proceedings pending against the husband.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

15 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

15 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

16 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

16 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

16 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

17 hours ago