States High court

Jharkhand HC Rebukes Centre for Inaction on Illegal Bangladeshi Immigration

The Jharkhand High Court has reprimanded the Union government, the Intelligence Bureau (IB), and the Border Security Force (BSF) for failing to file their affidavits in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the illegal immigration of Bangladeshi refugees into the state.

A bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad and Justice Arun Kumar Rai was presiding over the PIL, which addresses the influx of Bangladeshi refugees entering India through districts in the state’s Santhal Parganas region.

The division bench remarked that while Jharkhand was established for the welfare of its tribal communities, it appears that the Centre remains complacent regarding the issue of illegal Bangladeshi infiltration, despite the court’s directives.

The court further noted that while the IB and BSF operate around the clock to monitor illegal immigrants, they have failed to find time to submit an affidavit before the court.

The state government has already filed its affidavit in the matter. However, the Union government has not yet complied with the court’s order to file its response. The bench has now directed the Union government to submit its affidavit within two weeks, with the next hearing scheduled for September 5.

The high court emphasized that illegal immigration from Bangladesh is a serious concern for both Jharkhand and the Centre. The court made this observation orally during the hearing.

The petitioner, in his plea, alleged that the refugees are establishing madrasas and settlements in five districts, which is disrupting the existence of the local tribal population. The petition also stated that Bangladeshi refugees are entering Jharkhand through the porous borders in the Santhal Parganas, with concentrations in the districts of Sahibganj, Pakur, Godda, Jamtara, and Dumka.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

4 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

4 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

4 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

5 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

5 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

5 hours ago