States High court

Rajasthan High Court Rejects Bail for Lynching Suspects in Rape Case

The Rajasthan High Court recently refused bail to three individuals accused of lynching a man suspected of raping the minor daughter of one of them. This instance took place in the case of Darshan Singh and Ors. v State of Rajasthan and Anr.

The Verdict: Mob Lynching Condemned

Justice Anil Kumar Upman emphasized that mob lynching is intolerable in a civilized society, asserting that society cannot regress to barbarism where individuals take the law into their own hands. The court’s order, dated March 14, highlighted that obstructing law enforcement officials from maintaining order is equally unacceptable.

Charges and Legal Proceedings

The accused were charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act. These included offenses related to rioting, unlawful assembly, wrongful confinement, theft, extortion, criminal intimidation, murder, and criminal conspiracy, along with an additional charge under the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Act for committing an offense against a member of the SC or ST community.

Defense and Allegations

In their defense, the accused contended that they were falsely implicated in the case. They alleged that the deceased, who had purportedly raped one of the accused’s minor daughters, had sustained injuries while attempting to flee after the assault. Furthermore, they cited the registration of an FIR for the rape offense and claimed that the guilt of the deceased had been established.

Prosecution’s Stand

The Public Prosecutor SK Mahala informed the Court that the fourth accused, a woman, was granted bail due to her gender and lack of specific charges against her. He accused her of participating in the assault on the deceased and obstructing the police from taking him to the hospital, leading to his death. 

Court’s Observations and Decision

The Court acknowledged the severity of the accusations, emphasizing that society cannot condone vigilante justice. It affirmed that legal proceedings regarding the rape accusation would proceed impartially and that the accused could not use it as a shield. Considering the gravity of the offense and the allegations, the Court declined to grant bail, thus rejecting the appeal.

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

7 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

7 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

8 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

8 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

9 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

9 hours ago