States High court

“Kangana Agrees To Cuts Suggested In Film ‘Emergency'”: Censor Board To HC

The Central Board of Film Certification on Monday has informed the Bombay High Court that actor-producer Kangana Ranaut has consented to the cuts suggested for her film “Emergency.”

A division bench comprising Justices BP Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla was addressing a petition filed by Zee Entertainment Enterprises, the film’s co-producer, seeking a directive for the CBFC to issue a certification for the movie.

Initially scheduled for release on September 6, “Emergency” has faced delays due to the CBFC’s non-issuance of the required certification. Ranaut, who directed, co-produced, and stars as former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, has accused the CBFC of stalling the certification process to postpone the film’s release.

The biographical drama has drawn controversy, with some Sikh organizations, including the Shiromani Akali Dal, objecting to its portrayal of historical events and alleging misrepresentation of the Sikh community.

During the hearing, advocate Sharan Jagtiani, representing Zee Entertainment, stated that Ranaut has communicated her agreement to the CBFC’s proposed changes. However, he noted that Zee Entertainment requires additional time to confirm the specific cuts to be made. Ranaut’s production company, Manikarnika Films, is also co-producing the movie.

CBFC counsel Abhinav Chandrachud assured the bench that the suggested cuts would not reduce the film’s length and that most changes have already been accepted by Manikarnika Films.

The court has adjourned the matter until October 3, instructing both parties to seek proper guidance. Zee Entertainment’s plea asserts that the CBFC has already prepared the certification for the film but has refrained from issuing it. The company has previously claimed that the certification delay may be politically motivated, particularly with the upcoming elections in Haryana.

The bench raised questions regarding the rationale behind the ruling party’s potential opposition to Ranaut, who is a Member of Parliament from the BJP.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

“Engineer Rashid Can’t Be Allowed To Use Legislator Status For Reprieve”: NIA To Delhi HC

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Monday opposed jailed Jammu and Kashmir MP Sheikh Abdul…

17 hours ago

Delhi Jal Board Vandalism Case: Court Orders Supply Of Charge Sheets To Raghav Chadha

The Rouse Avenue Court has ordered that a copy of the charge sheet and supplementary…

18 hours ago

“We’ve To Trust Our Institutions”: SC On Plea Seeking Independent Method To Appoint CAG

The Supreme Court on Monday issued a notice to the Union Government on a petition…

19 hours ago

Delhi HC Impedes Restaurants From Using Names Similar To ‘Domino’s Pizza’

The Delhi High Court on Monday ruled in favor of Domino’s Pizza in a trademark…

20 hours ago

2023 Illegal Land Allotment Case: SC Rejects Bail Plea Of Ex-Gujarat IAS Officer

The Supreme Court on Monday denied bail to retired IAS officer Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma in…

20 hours ago

SC Lifts NGT Ban On Auroville Project, Stresses Balance Between Development & Environment

The Supreme Court on Monday set aside the National Green Tribunal’s order that had barred…

21 hours ago