States High court

Karnataka HC Awards ₹8 Lakh to Family of Woman Who Died Boarding Wrong Train

The Karnataka High Court has reversed a ruling made by the Railway Claims Tribunal and awarded compensation of ₹8,00,000 to the family of a woman who tragically died while trying to board an incorrect train in February 2014.

Facts of the Case

Jayamma, along with her sister Rathnamma, had boarded the wrong train; instead of boarding the Tirupati passenger train bound for Ashokapuram/Mysore, they had boarded the Tuticorin Express. When they realized that they were on the wrong train, by that time the train had started to move, and out of sheer panic, they attempted to disembark, which resulted in Jayamma sustaining fatal injuries that eventually resulted in her death.

In 2016, the family moved to the Railway Claims Tribunal, wherein the Tribunal was of the opinion that Jayamma’s death was a “self-inflicted” injury as per Section 124-A of the Indian Railways Act. The Tribunal held that Jayamma failed to utilize any available option, that is, either continuing the journey to the next station or pulling the alarm chain. The tribunal dismissed their plea for compensation, citing negligence on Jayamma’s part and labeling her death as a “self-inflicted injury.” Subsequently, Jayamma’s family appealed to the high court.

High Court’s Ruling

Justice H. P. Sandesh of the Karnataka High Court disagreed with the Tribunal’s interpretation, highlighting Jayamma’s status as a genuine passenger and asserting that her death stemmed from an ‘untoward incident,’ a position endorsed by the Supreme Court. The judge criticized the tribunal’s use of Section 124-A, arguing that its application was incorrect in this context.

As a result, the court has recently directed the railways to provide ₹400,000 in compensation with a seven percent interest rate. This ensures that the total amount awarded to the family reaches no less than ₹800,000, inclusive of interest.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago