States High court

Karnataka HC: Saying “Go and Hang Yourself’ Doesn’t Amount to Abetment

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Karnataka High Court quashed the charges of abetment to suicide that were leveled against the petitioner, stating that mere utterance of the words ‘go and hang yourself’ doesn’t amount to charges mentioned under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

The facts of the case

The petitioner had confronted the junior priest regarding the alleged illicit relations between him and the petitioner’s wife. The petitioner had threatened and hurled abuses at the junior priest on a phone call, threatened that he’d tell everyone about this affair, and, in a fit of rage, asked him to “go and hang yourself’.

The First Information Report (FIR) claimed that the priest had taken his own life following a discussion with the accused, during which the accused allegedly urged the priest to “commit suicide” due to his alleged relationship with the accused’s wife.

Court’s Ruling

The court ruled that the petitioner said those words out of agony when he said “go and hang yourself” and that the junior priest ended his life after releasing that someone else had come to know about his illicit relationship.
The court highlighted that according to IPC Section 107, which deals with abetment, if the accused deliberately assists in any action against the victim that fulfills the criteria of Section 306 (abetment to suicide), then it is applicable.

Since the petitioner didn’t intend upon his words and the words “go and hang yourself” were said only out of frustration and agony, the petitioner cannot be tried on the grounds of abetment to suicide.

Justice Nagaprasanna stated that considering all the facts, the complaint, and the summary of the charge sheet in accordance with the principles set by the Apex Court, it is clear that the petitioner, who is the sole accused and the husband of the woman with whom the deceased Father had a certain relationship, expressing anger and telling the Father to “go and hang yourself” does not necessarily fulfill the requirements of Section 107 of the IPC to constitute an offense under Section 306 of the IPC for abetment to suicide. The court added that the reasons for the father’s suicide could be numerous, one of which might be his illicit relationship with the petitioner’s wife, despite being a father and a priest of a church. The court emphasized that understanding the human mind is complex and unraveling its mysteries is an impossible task.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational 

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Hyderabad Court Sentences Life Imprisonment To Priest Who Killed Lover, Sealed Body In Septic Tank

A Hyderabad court has sentenced Venkata Sai Surya Krishna, a priest, to life imprisonment for…

24 minutes ago

Sambhal Violence: UP Court Rejects Interim Bail To Shahi Jama Masjid President

A local court on Thursday rejected the interim bail plea of Zafar Ali, the president…

1 hour ago

DHC To Review AAP’s Somnath Bharti’s Petition Against BJP’s Satish Upadhyay’s Election Win

Aam Aadmi Party leader Somnath Bharti on Thursday has filed a petition in the Delhi…

2 hours ago

SC To Decide Maintainability Of Writ Petition Filed To Reconsider Death Penalty Based On 2022 ‘Manoj’ Verdict

The Supreme Court of India on Thursday to decide whether it can entertain a petition…

3 hours ago

Anti-CAA Case: Activist Sharjeel Imam Challenges Saket Court’s Order; HC Issues Notice

Activist Sharjeel Imam has approached the Delhi High Court on Thursday to challenge a recent…

3 hours ago

Cash Recovery Row: Allahabad HC Bar Association Heads Reach Delhi To Meet CJI Sanjiv Khanna

Days after the Supreme Court collegium recommended the transfer of Delhi High Court Judge Justice…

5 hours ago