States High court

Karnataka HC: Saying “Go and Hang Yourself’ Doesn’t Amount to Abetment

The Karnataka High Court quashed the charges of abetment to suicide that were leveled against the petitioner, stating that mere utterance of the words ‘go and hang yourself’ doesn’t amount to charges mentioned under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

The facts of the case

The petitioner had confronted the junior priest regarding the alleged illicit relations between him and the petitioner’s wife. The petitioner had threatened and hurled abuses at the junior priest on a phone call, threatened that he’d tell everyone about this affair, and, in a fit of rage, asked him to “go and hang yourself’.

The First Information Report (FIR) claimed that the priest had taken his own life following a discussion with the accused, during which the accused allegedly urged the priest to “commit suicide” due to his alleged relationship with the accused’s wife.

Court’s Ruling

The court ruled that the petitioner said those words out of agony when he said “go and hang yourself” and that the junior priest ended his life after releasing that someone else had come to know about his illicit relationship.
The court highlighted that according to IPC Section 107, which deals with abetment, if the accused deliberately assists in any action against the victim that fulfills the criteria of Section 306 (abetment to suicide), then it is applicable.

Since the petitioner didn’t intend upon his words and the words “go and hang yourself” were said only out of frustration and agony, the petitioner cannot be tried on the grounds of abetment to suicide.

Justice Nagaprasanna stated that considering all the facts, the complaint, and the summary of the charge sheet in accordance with the principles set by the Apex Court, it is clear that the petitioner, who is the sole accused and the husband of the woman with whom the deceased Father had a certain relationship, expressing anger and telling the Father to “go and hang yourself” does not necessarily fulfill the requirements of Section 107 of the IPC to constitute an offense under Section 306 of the IPC for abetment to suicide. The court added that the reasons for the father’s suicide could be numerous, one of which might be his illicit relationship with the petitioner’s wife, despite being a father and a priest of a church. The court emphasized that understanding the human mind is complex and unraveling its mysteries is an impossible task.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational 

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago