States High court

K’taka HC Emphasizes Mandatory FIR Registration for Cognizable Offences

The Karnataka High Court recently emphasized that the police are obligated to register a First Information Report (FIR) when the complaint reveals a cognizable offence.

A single bench of Justice Suraj Govindaraj stated that the failure of police officers to register an FIR in such instances would amount to a neglect of their duty.

“It was but required for the police officer to register an FIR when the complaint discloses a cognizable offense. The complaint having been filed on November 18, 2022, and FIR not having been registered till date is impermissible and would also amount to dereliction of duty,” the bench stated.

The petitioner’s case revolved around the non-registration of an FIR for a complaint lodged on November 18, 2022, against certain individuals. The petitioner alleged that the police did not register an FIR and took no action in response to the complaint, which detailed an assault on the petitioner’s daughter-in-law. The complaint further outlined the forcible confiscation of her cellphone, accompanied by verbal abuse and death threats. These actions were deemed punishable offences under the Indian Penal Code.

Taking the case’s facts into consideration, the Court granted the plea and instructed the police to register an FIR against the accused and initiate an investigation into the matter.

Significantly, the Court also directed the Director General of Police to issue a necessary circular or Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to all Station House Officers, in line with the directives laid out by the Supreme Court in the Lalita Kumari case. The Court’s directive included the provision of circulars/SOPs in both English and Kannada, along with the translation of the relevant paragraph from the Lalita Kumari case into Kannada.

Additionally, the Court mandated that the Director General of Police furnish Kannada-translated versions of the complete judgment to all Station House Officers.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago