The Karnataka High Court recently reprimanded the State Government over the lack of proper toilets and drinking water facilities in schools.
A bench of Chief Justice PB Varale and Justice MGS Kamalexpressed deep displeasure and issued directives to the State government to promptly address this issue. The court emphasized that the absence of these vital infrastructures in schools could potentially hinder the participation of even the most brilliant students in the progress of the State and the nation.
“This really pains us. Last time also we observed that, on one hand, those are the fortunate who have the facility of schools with all modern technology and gadgets and pure water and whatnot. Only because of this callous approach, somebody who may be desirous of having his education of his ward in a school becomes a dream for that poor parent (sic),” the bench stated.
Additionally, the Court mandated the government to conduct a comprehensive survey of schools across the State to assess the availability of these facilities. The government was given a strict deadline of two weeks to address the insufficient drinking water supply and implement necessary corrective measures.
“We make it clear that during survey, if shortcomings are pointed out, the State government may take rectifying measures immediately,” it added.
This order was passed subsequent to the Court’s review of a report submitted by the Amicus Curiae in a suo motu proceedings initiated in response to reported violations of children’s fundamental right to primary education. Upon reviewing images and reports of schools presented by the education department authorities, the Bench identified numerous deficiencies in the infrastructural amenities provided at these schools.
“Apparently, an attempt is made to show that now only in 38 schools, the toilet facility is not available and in all schools, drinking water is available“, the order reads.
Furthermore, the Court observed that the facilities provided failed to meet the necessary standards and were merely superficial, serving as “namesake” facilities.
“The photo, attached to the report, is undeniably distressing. There is no indication in the photo as to whether the toilet is designated for boys or girls. Additionally, the condition of the entire toilet block is extremely dilapidated, with even the outer wall and door appearing to have been hastily painted with a few coats,” the bench observed.
Furthermore, it was discovered that at one school, an attendant carried water on their head for drinking and cleaning purposes.
“Such a lackadaisical approach! Show some seriousness. Display some concern. Please refrain from defending this. It is deeply disheartening. We cannot express our anguish any further,” the bench stated.
Therefore, the bench adjourned the matter for a period of three months to allow filing of a fresh survey report.
