States High court

Lawyers Cannot Be Forced to Join ‘Black Day’ Protest against New Criminal Laws: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has observed that no lawyer can be compelled to stop work and participate in a lawyers’ strike recently called by the West Bengal Bar Council to protest the implementation of three new criminal laws on July 1.

A single bench of Justice Shampa Sarkar noted that the Bar Council’s resolution to mark July 1 as ‘Black Day’ in protest against the new criminal laws should be viewed as a request rather than a mandate.

The Court clarified that while the resolution called for advocates to abstain from judicial work and organize protest rallies, no willing lawyer should be forced to cease work. “It is a settled position of law that no one can be compelled to observe a strike or cease work. Lawyers discharge a public function for the litigants. Thus, this resolution of the Bar Council of West Bengal shall not be treated as a mandate on the learned advocates to abstain from work. Willing advocates are entitled to appear before the Courts all over West Bengal and Andaman & Nicobar Islands,” the Court stated.

The new criminal laws-namely the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)—are set to come into force on July 1. These laws are intended to replace the existing colonial-era criminal laws in India, including the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and the Indian Evidence Act.

The move has sparked controversy regarding its passage in Parliament, its potential impact on existing criminal cases, practical challenges in implementing the overhaul, and even the names of the new laws. On June 26, the State Bar Council of West Bengal announced that it would observe July 1 as ‘Black Day,’ passing a resolution condemning the laws as anti-people, undemocratic, and likely to cause significant hardship to the common man.

This decision by the Bar Council was challenged in the High Court, with the petitioner questioning the authority of the State Bar Council to call for such a strike. The High Court has allowed the Bar Council three weeks to file its response to the petition and has warned against preventing any lawyer from working on July 1 due to the Bar Council’s resolution.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

8 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

8 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

8 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

9 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

9 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

9 hours ago