States High court

Lawyers Cannot Be Forced to Join ‘Black Day’ Protest against New Criminal Laws: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has observed that no lawyer can be compelled to stop work and participate in a lawyers’ strike recently called by the West Bengal Bar Council to protest the implementation of three new criminal laws on July 1.

A single bench of Justice Shampa Sarkar noted that the Bar Council’s resolution to mark July 1 as ‘Black Day’ in protest against the new criminal laws should be viewed as a request rather than a mandate.

The Court clarified that while the resolution called for advocates to abstain from judicial work and organize protest rallies, no willing lawyer should be forced to cease work. “It is a settled position of law that no one can be compelled to observe a strike or cease work. Lawyers discharge a public function for the litigants. Thus, this resolution of the Bar Council of West Bengal shall not be treated as a mandate on the learned advocates to abstain from work. Willing advocates are entitled to appear before the Courts all over West Bengal and Andaman & Nicobar Islands,” the Court stated.

The new criminal laws-namely the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)—are set to come into force on July 1. These laws are intended to replace the existing colonial-era criminal laws in India, including the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and the Indian Evidence Act.

The move has sparked controversy regarding its passage in Parliament, its potential impact on existing criminal cases, practical challenges in implementing the overhaul, and even the names of the new laws. On June 26, the State Bar Council of West Bengal announced that it would observe July 1 as ‘Black Day,’ passing a resolution condemning the laws as anti-people, undemocratic, and likely to cause significant hardship to the common man.

This decision by the Bar Council was challenged in the High Court, with the petitioner questioning the authority of the State Bar Council to call for such a strike. The High Court has allowed the Bar Council three weeks to file its response to the petition and has warned against preventing any lawyer from working on July 1 due to the Bar Council’s resolution.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago