States High court

Legal Limbo: Ghostly Antics in Punjab and Haryana High Court as Deceased Seeks Anticipatory Bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court was left puzzled this week as it came across a plea seeking anticipatory bail for an accused who had died a month before his petition was filed. This instance took place in the case of Manjit Singh vs State of Punjab.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court found itself embroiled in an unprecedented legal conundrum this week when confronted with a plea seeking anticipatory bail for an accused who had long departed from this world. In a bizarre turn of events, the deceased individual, Manjit Singh, managed to stir up quite a storm in the courtroom, leaving even the seasoned justices scratching their heads.

Conjuring Legal Chaos

In an order issued on Thursday, Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul aptly described the situation as a “legal potpourri” concocted by the lawyer representing the late Manjit Singh. The audacity of filing a plea on behalf of a deceased client would have made even Houdini himself raise an eyebrow.

Unveiling the Mystery

The drama unfolded on Wednesday when the State produced Singh’s death certificate, revealing his demise on December 27, 2023. Despite this, his petition for anticipatory bail had been filed on January 24, leading to a perplexing scenario.

The Ghostly Petition

The Court expressed bewilderment at how a Power of Attorney from a deceased individual could have been procured and annexed to the petition. Adding to the intrigue, the petition even bore the signatures of the late petitioner, suggesting an eerie legal maneuver from beyond the grave.

Counsel’s Curious Explanation

When summoned before the Court, Singh’s counsel could not dispute his client’s demise but claimed to have been misled by an unknown individual. The counsel sought an unconditional apology, citing his unwitting involvement in the peculiar case.

Judicial Jest Amidst the Uncanny

While the courtroom found amusement in the surreal proceedings, Justice Kaul issued a stern warning to the counsel, urging caution in future legal endeavors to avoid summoning any more ghostly clients or entangling in supernatural legal quagmires.

A Grave Warning

The Court, while acknowledging the counsel’s relative inexperience, emphasized the importance of steering clear of such “otherworldly activities” to safeguard his promising career in the legal profession.

Conclusion

Ultimately, in light of the counsel’s apology and withdrawal of the plea, the Court allowed the request, bringing an end to this otherworldly legal escapade. However, the incident serves as a cautionary tale, reminding legal practitioners of the importance of diligence and discretion in navigating the complexities of the legal realm.

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

13 mins ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

34 mins ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

2 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

2 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

3 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

3 hours ago