States High court

Madras HC Chief Justice Recuses From Hearing Bar Association Membership Appeal

Justice SV Gangapurwala, Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, recused himself on Monday from hearing an appeal concerning a single judge’s order directing the Madras Bar Association to grant membership without discrimination.

The single judge had expressed criticism of the Association’s bye-laws, which were deemed to create obstacles for ordinary lawyers seeking membership. Additionally, the court directed the Association to provide a compensation of five lakh rupees to Senior Advocate Elephant G Rajendran for the denial of drinking water to his son by a senior lawyer in 2012.

During the proceedings before the bench comprising Justice Gangapurwala and Justice PD Audekesavalu, the Chief Justice mentioned that the single judge had issued an order regarding appropriate administrative measures to relocate the Bar Association from the High-Security Zone to an alternative location. Consequently, the Chief Justice stated his inability to hear the appeals.

“Shifting of Madras Bar Association / second respondent from “High-Security Zone” to any other place in the High Court premises is within the exclusive domain of the High Court administration. It is for the Registrar General, Madras High Court to initiate appropriate actions by placing all the facts before the Hon’ble The Chief Justice of Madras High Court,” Justice SM Subramaniam order stated.

The appeals originated from a single judge’s order, wherein the Bar Association was directed to provide compensation for an incident involving the denial of drinking water by one of its members. Furthermore, the single judge ordered the Bar Association to grant membership to all practicing lawyers of the High Court, without any form of discrimination based on caste, gender, religion, economic status, personal affiliations with Senior Advocates or dignitaries, or political affiliations.

Regarding the petitioner’s contention that the Madras Bar Association, currently situated within the High-Security zone of the High Court, should relocate to a new building within the Court premises, thus utilizing the occupied area for Court Halls, the single judge opined that such matters fell under the exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court administration. Consequently, the single judge directed the issue to be brought before the Chief Justice for consideration.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

10 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

11 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

12 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

12 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

13 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

13 hours ago