States High court

Madras HC Grants Bail To YouTuber Arrested For Hijab Video

The Madras High Court has recently granted bail to YouTuber Anash Ahamed, who got arrested by Coimbatore police in September on charges of cyber terrorism.

His arrest came from a video he recorded and shared on a private channel, urging people to wear hijabs and share their experiences.

In an order dated October 30, Justice P. Dhanbal considered various factors, including the nature of the offense, Ahamed’s lack of prior cases, and the period of his incarceration. “Considering the representation made on both sides… this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions,” the order stated.

The court set bail at ₹10,000 and required Ahamed to appear before the police every morning for the next month.

Ahamed was arrested on September 5 and charged under Sections 352 (intentional insult to disrupt public peace) and 353 (statements conducing to public mischief) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Additionally, he faced charges under Section 66(f) of the Information Technology Act for cyber terrorism, which relates to the use of technology to intimidate or cause harm.

The prosecution opposed Ahamed’s bail application, arguing that the video was designed to “cause disturbance to public peace” and to “promote enmity between two religions.” They claimed that his actions could lead to significant unrest within the community.

However, the court’s decision to grant bail indicates a recognition of Ahamed’s rights and the importance of considering the circumstances surrounding his case. The ruling reflects the judiciary’s cautious approach in matters involving free expression, especially when charges pertain to public discourse and community sensitivities.

Ahamed’s case has sparked discussions about the balance between maintaining public order and upholding freedom of speech, particularly in the context of sensitive religious issues.

As he prepares to comply with the bail conditions, the outcome of this case may set precedents for similar cases in the future, particularly concerning the use of social media in expressing personal and communal identities.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Chhath Puja Row: Delhi HC Refuses To Allow Puja At Bank Of Yamuna

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday denied permission to conduct Chhath Puja rituals on the…

3 mins ago

Atishi’s Counsel Seeks Time To File Rejoinder To Complainant’s Reply

The Rouse Avenue Court on Wednesday has granted time for Delhi Chief Minister Atishi Marlena's…

23 mins ago

SC Orders Ajit Pawar NCP To Issue Disclaimer On Clock Symbol Case Within 36 Hours

The Supreme Court on Wednesday has ordered the Ajit Pawar-led faction in Maharashtra to publish…

27 mins ago

Assam Court Orders Registration Of FIR Against IAS Officer

The Nalbari district court in Assam has recently ordered the registration of an FIR against…

44 mins ago

Sanjauli Mosque Row: Court Denies Stay On Order To Demolish Construction, Next Hearing On Nov 11

The issue of illegal construction at a mosque in Sanjauli, the largest suburb of Shimla,…

2 hours ago

Cal HC Directs WB Govt To Ensure Peace In All Localities During Festive Season

The Calcutta High Court directed the West Bengal government on Wednesday to take all necessary…

2 hours ago