States High court

Madras High Court Directs Equal Recognition for AYUSH Treatment Alongside Allopathy

The Madras High Court, in a recent development, has instructed the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) to treat Ayurveda, Yoga, Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy (AYUSH) therapies on an equal footing with allopathy when addressing insurance claims.

In a decree issued on November 21, Justice N Anand Venkatesh deemed it “discriminatory” for insurance companies to show a preference for allopathy over AYUSH treatments or establish different maximum caps and reimbursement amounts for AYUSH and allopathy treatments within insurance schemes.

Justice Venkatesh emphasized that traditional AYUSH treatments in India should be encouraged and receive the same consideration as allopathic treatment.

Individuals opting for AYUSH treatments should be entitled to the same insurance coverage for their expenses as those undergoing allopathic treatment. This directive is to be implemented by IRDAI in all future policies.

The judge asserted that individuals undergoing medical treatment have the right to choose between allopathy and traditional AYUSH treatments.

He reminded IRDAI that during the COVID-19 pandemic, when health services were overwhelmed and emergency cases were being treated around the clock, medical practitioners recommended traditional treatments, home remedies, and AYUSH treatments for those with milder infections.

In such circumstances, the Court deemed it unreasonable to impose restrictions on reimbursement caps, preventing policyholders from receiving reimbursement for expenses incurred in AYUSH hospitals.

The Court, in response to two petitions, one filed by a lawyer and another by a clerk seeking reimbursement under their respective insurance policies, discovered that IRDAI regulations imposed a cap on the maximum reimbursement for availing AYUSH hospital treatments.

This cap was considerably lower than that for allopathic treatments under similar policies.

While the private insurance company involved eventually formulated a comprehensive policy to cover AYUSH treatments in the present case, the Court directed IRDAI to take similar measures.

The Court concluded, “There shall be a direction to the third respondent to act upon the suggestion made by this Court to place AYUSH treatment on par with allopathy treatment and direct the insurance companies to reimburse the insurance amount on equal scales. Both the writ petitions are disposed of in the above terms.”

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Pending CAG Reports With CM Atishi Matter: Delhi HC To Hear BJP’s Vijendra Gupta’s Plea On Dec 24

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday will hear a fresh plea filed by Leader of…

19 minutes ago

SC Flags Doctor Shortage, Orders Special NEET Counselling

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) to hold a special…

2 hours ago

Delhi HC Turns Down Anticipatory Bail Plea Of Former IAS Puja Khedkar

The Delhi High Court on Monday rejected the anticipatory bail plea of former IAS officer…

2 hours ago

KJS Cement Case: SC Refuses To Set Aside Second FIR Against Pawan Kumar Ahluwalia

The Supreme Court of India recently declined to intervene in a case involving Pawan Kumar…

5 hours ago

Non-Compliance In 2021 Defamation Case: Former Diplomat Lakshmi Puri Moves Delhi HC Against TMC leader Saket Gokhale

Former Diplomat Lakshmi Puri on Monday has approached the Delhi High Court in relation to…

6 hours ago

Vandalism At Allu Arjun’s House: Hyderabad Court Grants Bail To 6 Accused

Six individuals, accused of vandalizing actor Allu Arjun's residence in Hyderabad's Jubilee Hills, has granted…

6 hours ago