States High court

Name Game: Bombay High Court Upholds Aurangabad, Osmanabad Renaming

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Bombay High Court, on Wednesday, rejected petitions contesting the State authorities’ decision to rename Aurangabad and Osmanabad as Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and Dharashiv, respectively.

Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Arif Doctor affirmed that the renaming notifications were lawful, stating, “The notifications renaming the cities and revenue divisions are valid.”

The previous Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) administration, headed by Uddhav Thackeray, decided to rename Aurangabad and Osmanabad during a cabinet meeting on June 29, 2021. Aurangabad city and revenue division were renamed ‘Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar,’ while Osmanabad was renamed ‘Dharashiv.’

The current government, led by Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, reaffirmed this decision on July 16, 2022. Subsequently, several petitions were filed in the High Court by various individuals, including residents of the respective districts. These petitions argued that the state government had previously abandoned an attempt to rename Aurangabad in 2001.

However, the issue was revived by former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray’s administration for alleged political gain during his last cabinet meeting.

The petitioners argued that the renaming decision violated constitutional provisions. They contended that renaming Osmanabad to Dharashiv could provoke religious and communal tensions, undermining India’s secular principles. They highlighted a previous failed attempt by the Maharashtra government in 1998 to rename Osmanabad to Dharashiv.

In response, the Maharashtra government defended the name change, stating that it did not incite religious or communal discord but rather was celebrated by the majority. They refuted claims that the renaming was politically motivated to stoke hatred towards a particular community.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

SC Upholds Disqualification Of Himachal Pradesh Pradhan For Concealing Criminal Case

The Supreme Court has upheld the Himachal Pradesh High Court's decision that candidates contesting panchayat…

1 day ago

Delhi Court To Hear Satyender Jain’s Defamation Case; Confirms Jurisdiction

The Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court on Saturday has ruled that it has jurisdiction to proceed…

1 day ago

Copyright Case: Delhi HC Directs A R Rahman, Ponniyin Selvan 2 Makers To Deposit Rs 2 cr

The Delhi High Court has determined that “Veera Raja Veera,” featured in the film Ponniyin…

1 day ago

Road Rage Case: Karnataka HC Obstructs IAF Officer From Police Action

The Karnataka High Court has barred Bengaluru police from arresting Indian Air Force (IAF) Wing…

1 day ago

Defamation Case: Pune Court Summons Rahul Gandhi Over His Remarks On Savarkar

A Pune court has called Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to appear on May 9 in…

1 day ago

Madras HC Restores 2 Disproportionate Assets Cases Against Minister Panneerselvam

The Madras High Court has revived two disproportionate assets (DA) cases against DMK leader and…

1 day ago