States High court

‘No Faith in State Machinery Now’: HC Raps Gujarat Govt Over Game Zone Fire

The Gujarat High Court on Monday expressed strong disapproval of the Rajkot civic body’s handling of the game zone fire, which resulted in the deaths of 27 individuals. It asserted a lack of confidence in the state machinery, criticizing its tendency to react only after innocent lives are lost.

Questioning the Rajkot Municipal Corporation’s oversight, the court asked whether it had overlooked the construction of such a significant structure in its vicinity. The RMC’s lawyer disclosed that the TRP game zone had not obtained the necessary permissions.

A special bench comprising Justices Biren Vaishnav and Devan Desai presided over a suo motu PIL concerning the game zone fire incident.

Accountability of Municipal Commissioners

The court further remarked that all Rajkot municipal commissioners, from the establishment of the TRP game zone in 2021 until the recent incident on May 25, should be held accountable for the tragedy. It directed them to submit separate affidavits.

The fire at the TRP game zone in Rajkot’s Nana-Mava area on Saturday evening resulted in the loss of 27 lives, including children.

The game zone operated without the required fire NOC (no objection certificate), according to officials.

Taking suo motu cognizance of the fire tragedy on Sunday, the HC deemed it a prima facie “man-made disaster.”

Call for Drastic Measures

On Monday, a counsel emphasized the need for immediate preventive and corrective measures following the unfortunate incident. They stressed that the state government must take accountability, calling for drastic actions.

In response, the court expressed skepticism regarding who would implement such drastic measures. “Honestly speaking, we do not have faith in the state machinery now,” the court observed. It noted that despite previous court orders and assurances from authorities, this incident marked the sixth occurrence.

“They only want lives to be lost and then trigger the machinery,” the court remarked.

In response to the RMC counsel’s assertion that the game zone hadn’t sought necessary permissions from authorities, the court questioned whether the civic body was oblivious to the emergence of such a large structure within its jurisdiction.

“Are you suggesting that you were unaware of the existence of this substantial structure? What explanation does the corporation offer for the presence of this zone for the past two-and-a-half years? What measures were taken for fire safety? Were you cognizant of entertainment tax during ticketing? It seems you are entirely neglecting the issue,” remarked the court.

The High Court sought clarification on when the corporation first acknowledged the presence of the game zone.

“Until then, were you completely unaware of such a structure in the vicinity? Were you not informed about this court’s orders regarding fire safety in a PIL? What actions were taken during that time? There are media reports suggesting that your municipal commissioner attended the inauguration. Can we not take judicial notice of that fact? For 18 months, what actions did the corporation take? Did they simply neglect it?” queried the bench.

The court also noted that all municipal commissioners, starting from the establishment of the TRP game zone in 2021 until the incident, should be held responsible for the tragedy. It directed them to submit separate affidavits.

“At this stage, we refrain from issuing any orders, though we strongly desire to suggest the suspension of the officers involved for neglecting their duties and failing to comply with this court’s directives. However, we withhold this action in the hope of giving them a chance,” further stated the bench.

The high court instructed the incumbent RMC commissioner and officers who served as municipal commissioners from July 2021 until the incident date to file affidavits, detailing issues regarding certificates on structural stability and other relevant matters.

Additionally, the court directed chief fire officers of Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Surat, and Rajkot municipal corporations to submit affidavits on fire safety measures within their jurisdictions, including the installation of fire hydrants, inspection of fire safety equipment, and obtaining licenses from respective collectorates or mamlatdars.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago