States High court

‘Pension is Earned Entitlement, Not Discretionary Benefit: Himachal Pradesh HC

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has affirmed that pension is not a discretionary benefit but a rightfully earned entitlement for dedicated service, according to a press release issued recently.

The court’s decision emphasized that pension is a social security scheme in line with the socio-economic requirements of the Constitution, providing support for the post-retirement period.

The decision came from a division Bench of Justice Vivek Singh Thakur and Justice Bipin Chander Negi, following an appeal filed by Sh. Roop Lal.

The petitioner had initially worked as a Fitter on a daily wage basis in the Irrigation & Public Health (IPH) Department in 1991, and his services were regularized in 2002. After serving on a regular basis for eight years, he retired in 2010. However, the minimum qualifying period of service required for pension eligibility is ten years of regular service.

The petitioner approached the High Court 12 years after retirement. The Court recognized that the claim for pension is a recurring cause of action. While any delay in filing the petition might disqualify the petitioner from receiving interest, he is still entitled to receive monetary benefits prospectively.

As per the official release, the Court found the petitioner eligible for a pension based on a Supreme Court verdict. This verdict states that services rendered as a regular employee should be calculated, and one year of regular service should be added for every five years of service as a daily wage worker. If the length of service is more than eight years but less than ten years, it should be reckoned as ten years.

The Court directed the State Government to grant all pension benefits to the petitioner within one month. However, the petitioner is entitled to monetary benefits three years prior to the date of filing the petition. Any benefits accruing more than three years before the petition’s filing will be on a notional basis.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago