States High court

Petition in Punjab & Haryana HC Against Govt’s Actions Hindering Farmer’s Protests

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

A petition has been filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the “obstructive actions” of both the Central and State governments, which includes the sealing of the border between Haryana and Punjab aimed at “preventing farmers from exercising their constitutional right to assemble and protest peacefully.”

The plea also raises concerns about the suspension of mobile internet services and bulk SMS in several districts of Haryana, including Ambala, Kurukshetra, Kaithal, Jind, Hisar, Fatehabad, and Sirsa, arguing that such measures “further exacerbate the situation, depriving citizens of their right to information and communication.”

The farmers are advocating for the enactment of a law guaranteeing a minimum support price for crops among other demands.

Uday Pratap Singh, a lawyer based in Chandigarh, has initiated the move in the High Court seeking an urgent interim order to halt all “obstructive actions” against the farmers’ protests.

“The arbitrary and illegal non-payment of Minimum Support Price has sparked a deep sense of discontentment and betrayal among the hardworking farmers of the state. This unjust decision has inflicted trauma upon the impoverished farming community. Despite the farmers’ pleas for the government to honor their rightful demand for at least the minimum support price (MSP) for their produce, the authorities have turned a deaf ear to their concerns,” the petition states.

It is alleged that the State’s actions violate the fundamental rights of citizens to move freely under Article 19 of the Constitution and prohibit peaceful assembly. Pratap also seeks an independent inquiry into alleged arbitrary actions, including police intimidation and the installation of obstacles.

“In a country guided by the rule of law, actions taken by law enforcement authorities should be consistent with legal standards and respect fundamental rights and freedoms. Implementing obstacles such as layers of nails, reinforced concrete walls, electrification, and barbed wire fences may undermine the foundations of a democratic society governed by the rule of law, where respect for human rights and legal principles should prevail,” the plea adds.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Madras HC Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail To Comedian Kunal Kamra

The Madras High Court on Friday granted stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra interim transit anticipatory bail…

11 hours ago

“Restaurants Can’t Force Customers To Pay Service Charge”: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on Friday ruled that payment of service charge by customers at…

11 hours ago

Delhi HC Orders Engineer Rashid To Deposit Over ₹3.35 Lakh To Attend Parliament

The Delhi High Court on Friday directed Jammu and Kashmir Member of Parliament (MP), Abdul…

11 hours ago

Kerala HC Dissolves Petitions Seeking Probe Against CM Pinarayi Vijayan And His Daughter

The Kerala High Court on Friday dismissed 2 petitions seeking an investigation into allegations of…

12 hours ago

Supreme Court Sets Aside Plea For FIR Against Justice Yashwant Varma, Says Inquiry Ongoing

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking an FIR against Justice Yashwant Varma,…

14 hours ago

Staff Appointment Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Gives AIIMS Bhopal ‘Last Chance’ To Respond

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday issued a “last chance” to the All Indian…

14 hours ago